According to a 2022 systematic review, inadequate resources (financial and subject matter expertise), barriers to accessing shelved compounds and their trial data, and the lack of traditional IP protections for repurposed compounds are the key barriers to drug repurposing. There is a lack of financial incentives for pharmaceutical companies to explore the repurposing of generic drugs. Indeed, doctors can prescribe the drug
off-label and pharmacists can switch the branded version for a cheaper generic alternative. According to
Pharmacologist Alasdair Breckenridge and patent judge
Robin Jacob this issue is so significant that: "If a generic version of a drug is available, developers have little or no opportunity to recoup their investment in the development of the drug for a new indication". Drug repositioning present other challenges. First, the
dosage required for the treatment of a
novel disease usually differs from that of its original target disease, and if this happens, the discovery team will have to begin from
Phase I clinical trials, which effectively strips drug repositioning of its advantages of over de novo drug discovery. Second, the finding of new formulation and distribution mechanisms of existing drugs to the novel-disease-affected areas rarely includes the efforts of "pharmaceutical and toxicological" scientists. Third,
patent right issues can be very complicated for drug repurposing due to the lack of experts in the legal area of drug repositioning, the disclosure of repositioning online or via publications, and the extent of the novelty of the new drug purpose. == Drug repurposing in psychiatry ==