The East Baltic languages are less
archaic than their Western counterparts, with Latvian being the most innovative Baltic language. Certain linguistic features of East Baltic languages are usually explained by contacts with their Baltic Finnic neighbours. It is believed that stress retraction in Latvian is a consequence of their influence. Linguistic traits observed in the grammar of the Lithuanian language, such as the alteration of
consonants p and
b in Lithuanian dialects, the use of various syntactic borrowings like
genitive of negation (cf.
nematau vilko () 'I don’t see a wolf';
matau vilką (Accusative case|) 'I see a wolf') or indirect mood (e.g.
nešęs velnias akmenį 'a devil who was bringing the stone') are also attributed to the influence of Baltic Finnic languages. Other extinct languages of the Eastern family group are poorly understood as they are practically unattested. However, from the analysis of
hydronyms and retained loanwords, it is known that Selonian and Old Curonian languages possessed the retention of nasal vowels
*an,
*en,
*in,
*un. It is noted that Selonian, Semigallian and Old Latgalian palatalised soft velars
*k,
*g into
*c,
*dz while also depalatalising the sounds
*š,
*ž into
*s, *z respectively. This is observed in hydronyms and
oeconyms (e.g.
Zirnajai,
Zalvas,
Zarasai) as well as loanwords preserved in Lithuanian and Latvian dialects. It is believed that Semigallian possessed an uninflected pronoun, which was the equivalent to the Lithuanian
savo (e.g. Sem.
Savazirgi, Lith.
savo žirgai, meaning 'one's horses'). East Baltic would in many cases turn the diphthong
*ei into a monophthong, pronounced like the contemporary Latvian
jē and Lithuanian
ė. This would further develop in Lithuanian and Latvian to become the present diphthong
*ie (e.g. Lat.
dievs, Lith.
dievas 'god'). == References ==