Abortion debate Induced abortion has long been the source of considerable debate.
Ethical,
moral,
philosophical,
biological,
religious and
legal issues surrounding abortion are related to
value systems. Opinions of abortion may be about
fetal rights, governmental authority, and
women's rights. In both public and private debate, arguments presented in favor of or against abortion access focus on either the moral permissibility of an induced abortion, or the justification of laws permitting or restricting abortion. The
World Medical Association Declaration on Therapeutic Abortion notes, "circumstances bringing the interests of a mother into conflict with the interests of her unborn child create a dilemma and raise the question as to whether or not the pregnancy should be deliberately terminated". Abortion debates, especially pertaining to
abortion laws, are often spearheaded by groups advocating one of these two positions. Groups who favor greater legal restrictions on abortion, including complete prohibition, most often describe themselves as "
pro-life" while groups who are against such legal restrictions describe themselves as "
pro-choice". The
median voters stance on abortion varies by
jurisdiction and can result in
swing votes.
Modern abortion law Current laws pertaining to abortion are diverse. Religious, moral, and cultural factors continue to influence abortion laws throughout the world. The
right to life, the right to liberty, the right to
security of person, and the right to
reproductive health are major issues of human rights that sometimes constitute the basis for the existence or absence of abortion laws. In jurisdictions where abortion is legal, certain requirements must often be met before a woman may obtain a legal abortion (an abortion performed without the woman's consent is considered
feticide and is generally illegal). These requirements usually depend on the age of the fetus, often using a
trimester-based system to regulate the window of legality, or as in the U.S., on a doctor's evaluation of the fetus'
viability. Some jurisdictions require a waiting period before the procedure, prescribe the distribution of information on
fetal development, or require that
parents be contacted if their minor daughter requests an abortion. Other jurisdictions may require that a woman obtain the
consent of the fetus' father before aborting the fetus, that abortion providers inform women of health risks of the procedure—sometimes including "risks" not supported by the medical literature—and that multiple medical authorities certify that the abortion is either medically or socially necessary. Many restrictions are waived in emergency situations. China, which has ended their
one-child policy, and now has a three-child policy, has at times incorporated mandatory abortions as part of their population control strategy. Other jurisdictions ban abortion almost entirely. Many, but not all, of these allow legal abortions in a variety of circumstances. These circumstances vary based on jurisdiction, but may include whether the pregnancy is a result of rape or incest, the fetus' development is impaired, the woman's physical or mental well-being is endangered, or socioeconomic considerations make childbirth a hardship. Some countries, such as Bangladesh, that nominally ban abortion, may also support clinics that perform abortions under the guise of menstrual hygiene. This is also a terminology in traditional medicine. In places where abortion is illegal or carries heavy social stigma, pregnant women may engage in
medical tourism and travel to countries where they can terminate their pregnancies.
Women on Waves has provided medication abortion and education on a ship in international waters off the coast of countries with restrictive abortion laws. Women without the means to travel can resort to providers of illegal abortions or attempt to perform an abortion by themselves.
Sex-selective abortion Sonography and
amniocentesis allow parents to determine sex before childbirth. The development of this technology has led to
sex-selective abortion, or the termination of a fetus based on its sex. The selective termination of a female fetus is most common. Sex-selective abortion is partially responsible for the noticeable disparities between the birth rates of male and female children in some countries. The preference for male children is reported in many areas of Asia, and abortion used to limit female births has been reported in Taiwan, South Korea, India, and China. This deviation from the standard birth rates of males and females occurs despite the fact that the country in question may have officially banned sex-selective abortion or even sex-screening. Many countries have taken legislative steps to reduce the incidence of sex-selective abortion. At the
International Conference on Population and Development in 1994 over 180 states agreed to eliminate "all forms of discrimination against the girl child and the root causes of son preference", conditions also condemned by a
PACE resolution in 2011. The
World Health Organization and
UNICEF, along with other
United Nations agencies, have found that measures to restrict access to abortion in an effort to reduce sex-selective abortions have unintended negative consequences, largely stemming from the fact that women may seek or be coerced into seeking unsafe, extralegal abortions.
Anti-abortion violence Abortion providers and facilities have been subjected to violence, including murder, assault, arson, and bombing. Some scholars consider anti-abortion violence to be within the
definition of terrorism, a view shared by some governments. In the U.S. and Canada, over 8,000 incidents of violence, trespassing, and death threats have been recorded by providers since 1977, including over 200 bombings/arsons and hundreds of assaults. Abortion clinics have also been targeted by
acid attacks, invasions, and vandalism The majority of abortion opponents have not been involved in violent acts. Physicians and other abortion clinic staff have been murdered by abortion opponents. In the United States, at least four physicians have been murdered in connection with their work at abortion clinics, including
David Gunn (1993),
John Britton (1994),
Barnett Slepian (1998), and
George Tiller (2009). In Canada, gynecologist
Garson Romalis survived murder attempts in both 1994 and 2000. Besides physicians, killings have targeted other clinic staff, such as
John Salvi's 1994 murder of two receptionists in Massachusetts clinic and
Peter Knight's 2001 murder of a security guard in a
Melbourne clinic. Notable perpetrators of anti-abortion violence include
Eric Rudolph,
Scott Roeder,
Shelley Shannon, and
Paul Hill, the first person to be executed in the United States for murdering an abortion provider. Some countries have
laws to protecting access to abortion. Such laws prevent abortion opponents from interfering with access to legal abortion services. For example, the American
Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act bars the use of threats or violence to interfere with abortion access. Abortion access laws may also establish
safe access zones around abortion clinics, with limits on protests and enhanced penalties for anti-abortion violence. Psychological pressure may also be used to limit abortion access. Some protestors record women entering clinics on camera. ==Non-human examples==