Ancient world Investigation into electromagnetic phenomena began about 5,000 years ago. There is evidence that the ancient
Chinese,
Mayan, and potentially even
Egyptian civilizations knew that the naturally magnetic mineral
magnetite had attractive properties, and many incorporated it into their art and architecture. Ancient people were also aware of
lightning and
static electricity, although they had no idea of the mechanisms behind these phenomena. The
Greek philosopher
Thales of Miletus discovered around 600 B.C.E. that
amber could acquire an electric charge when it was rubbed with cloth, which allowed it to pick up light objects such as pieces of straw. Thales also experimented with the ability of magnetic rocks to attract one other, and hypothesized that this phenomenon might be connected to the attractive power of amber, foreshadowing the deep connections between electricity and magnetism that would be discovered over 2,000 years later. Despite all this investigation, ancient civilizations had no understanding of the mathematical basis of electromagnetism, and often analyzed its impacts through the lens of
religion rather than science (lightning, for instance, was considered to be a creation of the gods in many cultures).
19th century Electricity and magnetism were originally considered to be two separate forces. This view changed with the publication of
James Clerk Maxwell's 1873
A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism in which the interactions of positive and negative charges were shown to be mediated by one force. There are four main effects resulting from these interactions, all of which have been clearly demonstrated by experiments: • Electric charges '
or ' one another with a force
inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them: opposite charges attract, like charges repel. • Magnetic poles (or states of polarization at individual points) attract or repel one another in a manner similar to positive and negative charges and always exist as pairs: every north pole is yoked to a south pole. • An electric current inside a wire creates a corresponding circumferential magnetic field outside the wire. Its direction (clockwise or counter-clockwise) depends on the direction of the current in the wire. • A current is induced in a loop of wire when it is moved toward or away from a magnetic field, or a magnet is moved towards or away from it; the direction of current depends on that of the movement. Soon thereafter he published his findings, proving that an electric current produces a magnetic field as it flows through a wire. The
CGS unit of
magnetic induction (
oersted) is named in honor of his contributions to the field of electromagnetism. His findings resulted in intensive research throughout the scientific community in electrodynamics. They influenced French physicist
André-Marie Ampère's developments of a single mathematical form to represent the magnetic forces between current-carrying conductors. Ørsted's discovery also represented a major step toward a unified concept of energy. This unification, which was observed by
Michael Faraday, extended by
James Clerk Maxwell, and partially reformulated by
Oliver Heaviside and
Heinrich Hertz, is one of the key accomplishments of 19th-century
mathematical physics. It has had far-reaching consequences, one of which was the understanding of the nature of
light. Unlike what was proposed by the electromagnetic theory of that time, light and other
electromagnetic waves are at present seen as taking the form of
quantized, self-propagating
oscillatory electromagnetic field disturbances called
photons. Different
frequencies of oscillation give rise to the different forms of
electromagnetic radiation, from
radio waves at the lowest frequencies, to visible light at intermediate frequencies, to
gamma rays at the highest frequencies. Ørsted was not the only person to examine the relationship between electricity and magnetism. In 1802,
Gian Domenico Romagnosi, an Italian legal scholar, deflected a magnetic needle using a Voltaic pile. The factual setup of the experiment is not completely clear, nor if current flowed across the needle or not. An account of the discovery was published in 1802 in an Italian newspaper, but it was largely overlooked by the contemporary scientific community, because Romagnosi seemingly did not belong to this community. An earlier (1735), and often neglected, connection between electricity and magnetism was reported by a Dr. Cookson. The account stated:A tradesman at Wakefield in Yorkshire, having put up a great number of knives and forks in a large box ... and having placed the box in the corner of a large room, there happened a sudden storm of thunder, lightning, &c. ... The owner emptying the box on a counter where some nails lay, the persons who took up the knives, that lay on the nails, observed that the knives took up the nails. On this the whole number was tried, and found to do the same, and that, to such a degree as to take up large nails, packing needles, and other iron things of considerable weight ...
E. T. Whittaker suggested in 1910 that this particular event was responsible for lightning to be "credited with the power of magnetizing steel; and it was doubtless this which led Franklin in 1751 to attempt to magnetize a sewing-needle by means of the discharge of Leyden jars." == A fundamental force ==