On October 31, 2016,
The New York Times published an article by Lichtblau and Steven Lee Myers indicating that intelligence agencies believed that Russian interference in the
2016 United States presidential election was not aimed at electing
Republican presidential candidate
Donald Trump. It was subsequently revealed that multiple United States intelligence agencies were conducting an investigation at the time into possible covert aid from the Kremlin to the Trump campaign. This led to criticism of
Times' coverage of the election, and speculation that the
Times reporting, and the October 31 article in particular, contributed to Trump's victory. On January 20, 2017, the
Times published an article by the public editor acknowledging that the
Times staff, including the editors and Lichtblau, had access to materials and details indicating that the Russian interference was aimed at electing Trump, contradicting the October 31 article, and stating that "a strong case can be made that the
Times was too timid in its decisions not to publish the material it had".
Daniel Pfeiffer, former senior advisor to president
Barack Obama, characterized the decision not to publish the story while at the same time publishing many articles that fueled the
Hillary Clinton email controversy as a "black mark" in the newspaper's history.
The New York Times editor
Dean Baquet dismissed the controversy, stating that the public editor article is a "bad column" that comes to a "fairly ridiculous conclusion". It was later reported that in the editing of the piece,
New York Times editors "downplayed what Lichtblau and Myers wanted to highlight" in the article and "cast the absence of a conclusion as the article's central theme rather than the fact of the investigation itself", which was "contrary to the wishes of the reporters." In June 2017, Lichtblau resigned from
CNN after an article about a Senate investigation into
Russian Direct Investment Fund was retracted because it did not meet CNN’s editorial standards. ==Works==