According to Altholz,
Essays sold 22,000 copies in two years, more than
Origin sold in its first twenty years. It sparked five years of increasingly polarized debate with books and pamphlets furiously contesting the issues. The book summed up a three-quarter-century-long challenge to biblical history by the
higher critics and to biblical prehistory by scientists working in the new fields of geology and biology.
Baden Powell restated his argument that God is a lawgiver, miracles break the lawful edicts issued at the creation, therefore belief in miracles is atheistic, and wrote of "Mr Darwin's masterly volume" that the
Origin of Species "must soon bring about an entire revolution in opinion in favour of the grand principle of the self-evolving powers of nature." "Outwardly, the conflict ended inconclusively, with the acquittal of Williams and Wilson by the courts and the condemnation of the volume by the clergy in Convocation. At a deeper level, it marked the exhaustion both of the Broad Church and of Anglican orthodoxy and the commencement of an era of religious doubt."
Reception A review by
Frederic Harrison published in the
Westminster Review in October 1860 had the probably undesired effect of stimulating the attack on the book. Harrison saw the essays as neither religious nor rational which was a double blow to the seven who saw the essays as promoting rational religion. In January 1861, an anonymous review was published in the
Quarterly Review. The author was later revealed as
Samuel Wilberforce, the
Bishop of Oxford. The
Quarterly review was followed up by a letter to
The Times co-signed by the
Archbishop of Canterbury and 25
bishops which threatened the theologians with the ecclesiastical courts. Darwin quoted a proverb: "A bench of bishops is the devil's flower garden", and joined others including the eminent geologist
Charles Lyell, and the mathematician and Queen's printer
William Spottiswoode, in signing a counter-letter supporting
Essays and Reviews for trying to "establish religious teachings on a firmer and broader foundation". On the subject, the mathematician Charles Dodgson (better known for his novels, published under the name
Lewis Carroll) wrote, "Let E = Essays, and R = Reviews: then the
locus of (E + R), referred to multilinear coordinates, will be found to be a
superficies (i.e., a locus possessing length and breadth, but no depth)."
Resolution Despite this alignment of pro-evolution scientists and
Unitarians with liberal churchmen, Williams and Wilson were charged with
heresy in the
Court of Arches. They were found guilty on some of the counts by the
Dean of Arches,
Stephen Lushington, but appealed to the
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. The Judicial Committee comprised secular judges sitting with the
Archbishop of Canterbury, the
Archbishop of York and the
Bishop of London. In 1864 it overturned the convictions, with the Archbishops of Canterbury and York dissenting in part (though the Bishop of London concurred in the decision). It was said that the Privy Council had "dismissed hell with costs". 11,000 clergy and 137,000 laity signed a letter of thanks to the Archbishops of Canterbury and York for voting against the committee, and a declaration in favour of biblical inspiration and eternal torments was drawn up at
Oxford and circulated to the 24,800 clergy, being signed by eleven thousand of them. Wilberforce went to the
Convocation of Canterbury and in June obtained "synodical condemnation" of
Essays and Reviews. == Influence ==