When described the genus
Eulithomyrmex was known from over forty separate fossils preserved as impressions in fine
shales of the
Florissant formation in Colorado. The formation is composed of successive lake deposits which have preserved a diverse assemblage of insects. The insects and plants suggest a climate similar to modern Southeastern North America, with a number of taxa represented that are now found in the subtropics to tropics and confined to the Old World. When
Eulithomyrmex was described, the Florissant formation was considered to be
Miocene in age, based on the flora and fauna preserved. Further refinement of the formation's age using radiometric dating of
sanidine crystals has resulted in an age of 34 million years old. This places the formation in the Eocene Priabonian stage. At the time of description the
holotype and three
paratypes of
E. rugosus plus the holotype and single paratype of
E. striatus were deposited in the
Museum of Comparative Zoology paleontology collections at
Harvard University. One additional paratype specimen, number 17,019a, was part of the collections of the
University of Colorado. The fossils were first studied by paleoentomologist
Frank M. Carpenter of the Museum of Comparative Zoology. His 1930
type description of the new species was published in the
Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology. Carpenter described the genus under the name
Lithomyrmex, with the two species respectively as
Lithomyrmex rugosus and
Lithomyrmex striatus. Carpenter designated
L. rugosus as the type species for the genus.
worker When described Carpenter noted the similarity between Eulithomyrmex
and the genus Agroecomyrmex
known from Baltic amber fossils and described in 1910 and placed both into the tribe Agroecomyrmecini. A third genus was added to the group in 1968 with the description of the living genus Tatuidris'' found in Central and South America. Placement of the group has changed several times, with the genera being placed in the
Myrmicinae tribe Agroecomyrmecini from 1930 until 2003. The placement of the tribe was challenged in 2003 by
Barry Bolton who suggested a closer relationship between the group and the "poneromorph" subfamilies. In addition to the suggested relationship, Bolton moved the tribe from Myrmicinae to a new subfamily,
Agroecomyrmecinae. == Description ==