Quarantine locations Australian Prime Minister
Scott Morrison announced plans in late January 2020 to quarantine Australian citizens evacuated from Wuhan, including children and the elderly, for a period of 14 days on
Christmas Island. The decision to repatriate those citizens using
controversial detention facilities formerly used to detain
asylum seekers before they were shut down in 2018 has received criticism. Controversially, the government plan also necessitates those evacuees to pay a fee of A$1,000, and would take them to
Perth after the quarantine period, where they would need to arrange their own transportation back to their home cities. The
Australian Medical Association, in a statement on the same day, stated that the decision to hold Australian citizens in "a place where has been previously the focus of populations under enormous mental and physical trauma and anguish, is not a really appropriate solution." In some places, local residents rallied against the decision to quarantine evacuees in their region. Residents of Nautana protested against the Indonesian government in early February 2020 for letting the evacuees stay there. Hundreds staged demonstrations and burned tires. As a result,
Brimob and
Indonesian National Armed Forces troops were deployed to ensure stable security conditions. To protect and give health assurance to local people, President
Joko Widodo ordered Health Minister
Terawan Agus Putranto to open a temporary office in Natuna. In the Philippines, the usage of the
New Clark City development as a quarantine site was met with opposition from the municipal council of
Capas. The local legislative said that they were not consulted by the national Department of Health and the
Bases Conversion and Development Authority regarding the plan and suggested the national government to consider a more isolated area as a quarantine site. After healthy Ukrainian evacuees returned from Wuhan to Ukraine on 20 February 2020,
misinformation caused riots as protestors railed against the decision to quarantine the passengers nearby the day after they flew back, and the evacuees' bus was attacked.
Fees and payment responsibility Due to the nature of evacuation flights, being flown empty one-way and being arranged by charter airlines in many cases at short notice, many passengers have had to pay substantial fees for a seat. Notably, the U.S. Department of State couldn't show that the prices it charged passengers for some chartered flights complied with its fare policy because it didn't have written guidance for calculating and documenting actual costs. In the United States, a bill was introduced in Congress to propose waiving travel expenses for US citizens evacuated. and in Nigeria, flights have been subsidised by the government. Indian migrant workers also suffered with high prices, which were compounded by their lack of income due to the lockdown and economic downturn. In response, the
Jharkhand government and Congress Party branch said it would pay train fares for migrants leaving the state as well as organise special trains for residents to get to their hometowns.
Improper procedures In the United States, a
Department of Health and Human Services employee claimed that the workers who received Americans from the first evacuation from Wuhan were inadequately trained and equipped. ==Notes==