Medicine has a long history of scientific inquiry into the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of human disease. In the 11th century AD,
Avicenna, a Persian physician and philosopher, developed an approach to EBM that was mostly similar to current ideas and practises. The concept of a controlled clinical trial was first described in 1662 by
Jan Baptist van Helmont in reference to the practice of
bloodletting. Wrote Van Helmont: The first published report describing the conduct and results of a controlled clinical trial was by
James Lind, a Scottish naval surgeon who conducted research on
scurvy during his time aboard
HMS Salisbury in the
Channel Fleet, while patrolling the
Bay of Biscay. Lind divided the sailors participating in his experiment into six groups, so that the effects of various treatments could be fairly compared. Lind found improvement in symptoms and signs of scurvy among the group of men treated with lemons or oranges. He published a treatise describing the results of this experiment in 1753. An early critique of statistical methods in medicine was published in 1835, in Comtes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris, by a man referred to as "Mr Civiale". In 1990,
Gordon Guyatt, then a young internal medicine residency coordinator at
McMaster University, introduced a teaching method he initially termed "Scientific Medicine." This approach emphasized applying critical appraisal techniques directly to bedside clinical decision-making, building on the work of his mentor,
David Sackett. However, the concept met resistance from colleagues, as it implied that existing clinical practices lacked scientific rigor, even though this was likely true. To address this, Guyatt rebranded the approach as "Evidence-Based Medicine", a term first formally introduced in a 1991 editorial in the ACP Journal Club. Although the name was coined in 1991, it took several years after and a concerted efforts of many other teams to define the foundations of this method. Although more popular in medicine, the concept of "evidence-based" is spreading to other disciplines, such as the humanities, and to languages other than English, albeit at a slower pace.
Clinical decision-making Alvan Feinstein's publication of
Clinical Judgment in 1967 focused attention on the role of clinical reasoning and identified biases that can affect it. In 1972,
Archie Cochrane published
Effectiveness and Efficiency, which described the lack of controlled trials supporting many practices that had previously been assumed to be effective. In 1973,
John Wennberg began to document wide variations in how physicians practiced. Through the 1980s,
David M. Eddy described errors in clinical reasoning and gaps in evidence. In the mid-1980s, Alvin Feinstein,
David Sackett and others published textbooks on clinical
epidemiology, which translated epidemiological methods to physician decision-making. Toward the end of the 1980s, a group at
RAND showed that large proportions of procedures performed by physicians were considered inappropriate even by the standards of their own experts.
Evidence-based guidelines and policies David M. Eddy first began to use the term 'evidence-based' in 1987 in workshops and a manual commissioned by the Council of Medical Specialty Societies to teach formal methods for designing clinical practice guidelines. The manual was eventually published by the
American College of Physicians. Eddy first published the term 'evidence-based' in March 1990, in an article in the
Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) that laid out the principles of evidence-based guidelines and population-level policies, which Eddy described as "explicitly describing the available evidence that pertains to a policy and tying the policy to evidence instead of standard-of-care practices or the beliefs of experts. The pertinent evidence must be identified, described, and analyzed. The policymakers must determine whether the policy is justified by the evidence. A rationale must be written." Those papers were part of a series of 28 published in
JAMA between 1990 and 1997 on formal methods for designing population-level guidelines and policies.
Medical education The term 'evidence-based medicine' was introduced slightly later, in the context of medical education. In the autumn of 1990,
Gordon Guyatt used it in an unpublished description of a program at
McMaster University for prospective or new medical students. Guyatt and others first published the term two years later (1992) to describe a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. This branch of evidence-based medicine aims to make individual decision making more structured and objective by better reflecting the evidence from research. Population-based data are applied to the care of an individual patient, while respecting the fact that practitioners have clinical expertise reflected in effective and efficient diagnosis and thoughtful identification and compassionate use of individual patients' predicaments, rights, and preferences. In 2010,
Greenhalgh used a definition that emphasized quantitative methods: "the use of mathematical estimates of the risk of benefit and harm, derived from high-quality research on population samples, to inform clinical decision-making in the diagnosis, investigation or management of individual patients." In the setting of individual decision-making, practitioners can be given greater latitude in how they interpret research and combine it with their clinical judgment. In 2005, Eddy offered an umbrella definition for the two branches of EBM: "Evidence-based medicine is a set of principles and methods intended to ensure that to the greatest extent possible, medical decisions, guidelines, and other types of policies are based on and consistent with good evidence of effectiveness and benefit."
Progress In the area of evidence-based guidelines and policies, the explicit insistence on evidence of effectiveness was introduced by the American Cancer Society in 1980. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) began issuing guidelines for preventive interventions based on evidence-based principles in 1984. In 1985, the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association applied strict evidence-based criteria for covering new technologies. Beginning in 1987, specialty societies such as the American College of Physicians, and voluntary health organizations such as the American Heart Association, wrote many evidence-based guidelines. In 1991,
Kaiser Permanente, a managed care organization in the US, began an evidence-based guidelines program. In 1991, Richard Smith wrote an editorial in the
British Medical Journal and introduced the ideas of evidence-based policies in the UK. In 1993, the Cochrane Collaboration created a network of 13 countries to produce systematic reviews and guidelines. In 1997, the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ, then known as the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, or AHCPR) established Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPCs) to produce evidence reports and technology assessments to support the development of guidelines. In the same year, a
National Guideline Clearinghouse that followed the principles of evidence-based policies was created by AHRQ, the AMA, and the American Association of Health Plans (now America's Health Insurance Plans). In 1999, the
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) was created in the UK to circulate evidence and guidance on treatments within the NHS. In the area of medical education, medical schools in Canada, the US, the UK, Australia, and other countries now offer programs that teach evidence-based medicine. A 2009 study of UK programs found that more than half of UK medical schools offered some training in evidence-based medicine, although the methods and content varied considerably, and EBM teaching was restricted by lack of curriculum time, trained tutors and teaching materials. Many programs have been developed to help individual physicians gain better access to evidence. For example, UpToDate was created in the early 1990s. The Cochrane Collaboration began publishing evidence reviews in 1993.
Current practice By 2000, use of the term
evidence-based had extended to other levels of the health care system. An example is evidence-based health services, which seek to increase the competence of health service decision makers and the practice of evidence-based medicine at the organizational or institutional level. The multiple tributaries of evidence-based medicine share an emphasis on the importance of incorporating evidence from formal research in medical policies and decisions. However, because they differ on the extent to which they require good evidence of effectiveness before promoting a guideline or payment policy, a distinction is sometimes made between evidence-based medicine and science-based medicine, which also takes into account factors such as prior plausibility and compatibility with established science (as when medical organizations promote controversial treatments such as
acupuncture). Differences also exist regarding the extent to which it is feasible to incorporate individual-level information in decisions. Thus, evidence-based guidelines and policies may not readily "hybridise" with experience-based practices orientated towards ethical clinical judgement, and can lead to contradictions, contest, and unintended crises. The most effective "knowledge leaders" (managers and clinical leaders) use a broad range of management knowledge in their decision making, rather than just formal evidence. Evidence-based guidelines may provide the basis for
governmentality in health care, and consequently play a central role in the governance of contemporary health care systems. == Methods ==