Bill C-38 Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act cutbacks to science The
omnibus Bill C-38 Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act which passed as a 2012 Budget Implementation Act in June 2012 amended the
Fisheries Act and closed the Experimental Lakes Area. Bill C-38 was given Royal Assent on June 29, 2012.
Fisheries Act In 2012, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans announced that it planned to discontinue supporting the site at the end of the financial year, March 31, 2013, at a cost of $50 million. The site would be either decommissioned or handed to a third-party operator. Senator
Jim Cowan at the 1st Session, 41st Parliament (June 21, 2012) expressed his concerns. "There are a number of proposed changes to the
Fisheries Act that are causing deep concern among Canadians. The bill amends the act to limit fish protection to the support of "commercial, recreational and Aboriginal fisheries." Protection of fish habitat is relegated to a vastly lower priority — something that caused those four former fisheries ministers, in their words, "especial alarm." Cowan also expressed dismay at the closure of Experimental Lakes Area. According to
Elizabeth May,
DFO dismantling ELA cabins In March 2013, with no advance notification to scientists whose personal belongings remained at the site or to the IISD, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans began dismantling cabins that had been used by the Experimental Lakes Project scientists. Scientist Roberto Quinlan of the Society of Canadian Limnologists said that this move "brings into serious doubt the government’s sincerity to actually transfer the facility over to another operator."
Defunding widely condemned by scientific community The decision to abruptly defund the ELA was widely condemned by the Canadian and international scientific community. The scientific journal
Nature in 2012, described the decision as "disturbing", and said that it "is hard to believe that finance is the true reason" for the closure. An open letter from five prominent scientific organizations, the
Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography, the
Ecological Society of America, the
International Society of Limnology, the Society of Canadian Limnologists, and the Society for Freshwater Sciences, expressed concern over the impact that a closure would have "on the strong and creative science that has been, and continues to be, conducted by Canadian freshwater researchers." An organization of Canadian citizens and scientists spearheaded by
Diane Orihel, the Coalition to Save ELA has been formed to pressure the Canadian government to reverse the decision to close the Experimental Lakes Area. The planned closure of the centre was the subject of an article 21 May 2012 in
Nature journal. On 25 May 2012 The
North American Lake Management Society (NALMS), representing nearly 1,000 members — researchers, scientists, administrators, and citizens — wrote a letter of concern regarding the imminent closure of ELA, arguing that NALMS' work "depends on findings from the ELA." NALMS asked the federal government to reconsider. "The Experimental Lakes Area (ELA) is a rare resource not only in Canada but throughout the world, as a dedicated research facility for ecosystem-scale experimental investigations and long-term monitoring of ecosystem processes. Operating for more than 40 years, it continues to study physical, chemical and biological processes and interactions operating on an ecosystem spatial scale and a multi-year time frame. These have led to extremely important discoveries. As an example, the world’s fertilizer industry now recognizes the importance of phosphorus in lakes and reservoirs, 40 years after its importance was demonstrated at ELA. Regulatory actions have been supported by ELA research, and now there is action by the industry as a result of research and activities at ELA over several decades. The experience gained at ELA by many scientists has resulted in the dissemination of environmental expertise and problem solving throughout the world, improving human conditions, protecting the environment, and saving millions of dollars for citizens and government agencies. Furthermore, we consider the work now in progress at ELA very important to the future of lake and reservoir management."
Response from opposition parties and Senators Many Canadian MPs called on the
Harper Government to reverse its decision on the forced closure of the Experimental Lakes Project.
NDP MP
Philip Toone argued that the "internationally recognized program with huge spin-offs for Canada will cost more to close and move than the $2 million that the government hopes to save."
International Institute for Sustainable Development The federal government led negotiations with the Ontario government, the Manitoba government and the
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), headquartered in Winnipeg, to keep the area operational in 2013 and ensure longer-term operations. IISD is funded by the UN, governments including the Canadian government, international organizations and philanthropic foundations. It also gets money from universities and private-sector companies including
TransCanada Energy,
Enbridge and
Manitoba Hydro. On April 1, 2014, IISD announced that three agreements have been signed involving IISD, the
Government of Ontario and the
Government of Canada that together ensure the long-term operation of the Experimental Lakes Area (ELA) research facility. Ontario Premier
Kathleen Wynne has committed support to keep the ELA "operating in the long term after the federal Conservative government walks away from the world-class freshwater research station at the end of August 2013." Dr. John Rudd, former DFO Research Scientist (1977-2002), ELA Chief Scientist (1998-2002), and winner of DFO's most prestigious award, the Deputy Minister's Prix d’Excellence (2002) argued that "IISD is not qualified on a scientific basis to run ELA... ELA is a unique facility and its scientific research needs to be directed by scientists who know how to do these experiments, but unfortunately, almost all present and recently retired scientists have been cut out of the transfer process." Elizabeth May, who served on the board of the International Institute for Sustainable Development for nine years prior to entering politics, argues that the "IISD, a think tank, is not necessarily the right organization to take on this mandate. However, keeping the ELA open and functioning, and in a public and transparent context, was paramount." == IISD-ELA today ==