and
James Dobson at the Values Voters conference in
Washington, D.C., 2007 Tony Perkins has blamed the
constitutional separation of church and state for encouraging the rise of
ISIS and similar Islamic extremist groups. The FRC has opposed efforts to make the
human papilloma virus (HPV)
vaccine mandatory for school attendance. HPV is a
virus that can be
transmitted by sexual contact, that can cause
cervical cancer. FRC defends its position on the basis of the
rights of parents and because of its support for abstinence prior to marriage. It supports a federal
conscience clause, allowing medical workers to refuse to provide certain treatments to their patients, such as abortion or
birth control. It also advocates for
abstinence-only sex education,
intelligent design, prayer in public schools and the regulation of pornography and other "
obscene,
indecent, or
profane programming" on
broadcast and
cable television. It unsuccessfully opposed the introduction of an
.xxx domain name and lobbied for an increase in indecency fines from the
Federal Communications Commission. The group holds that hotel pornography may be prosecutable under federal and state obscenity laws. It opposed the expansion of
civil rights laws to include
sexual orientation and
gender identity as illegal bases for
discrimination. Family Research Council supports the requirement of a one-year waiting period before a married couple with children can legally get a
divorce so that they can receive marital counseling, unless the marriage involves
domestic violence. FRC also supports permanently eliminating the
marriage penalty and
estate taxes. The Council opposes legalized abortion,
stem-cell research which involves the destruction of human embryos and funding thereof. (It advocates for research solely using
adult stem cells.) It opposes legal recognition of same-sex
domestic partnerships in the form of
marriage or
civil unions. It has opposed all forms of
gambling. The Council has questioned whether humans are mainly or completely responsible for
climate change, and has opposed other
evangelicals who accepted the
scientific consensus on it.
Statements on homosexuality The FRC maintains that "homosexual conduct is harmful to the persons who engage in it and to society at large, and can never be affirmed", and asserts that it is "by definition unnatural, and as such is associated with negative physical and psychological health effects." The Council also asserts that "there is no convincing evidence that a homosexual identity is ever something genetic or inborn". These positions are in opposition to
the consensus of mainstream psychological and medical experts that homosexuality is a normal, healthy variation of human behavior, and that sexual orientation is generally not chosen. Certain FRC statements and positions have been criticized as based upon
pseudo/junk science; according to
Wired, the group has misrepresented data and mis-designed sociological studies in order to negatively depict LGBT people. FRC also states that "[s]ympathy must be extended to those who struggle with unwanted same-sex attractions, and every effort should be made to assist such persons to overcome those attractions, as many already have". according to a 2009 publication from the American Psychological Association, "[there] are no studies of adequate scientific rigor to conclude whether or not recent [sexual orientation change efforts] do or do not work to change a person's sexual orientation." Jointly with
Focus on the Family, the Council submitted an
amicus brief in
Lawrence v. Texas, The summary of the
amicus curiae brief declares that "[states] may discourage the 'evils' ... of sexual acts outside of marriage by means up to and including criminal prohibition" and that it is
constitutionally permissible for Texas to "choose to protect marital intimacy by prohibiting same-sex 'deviate' acts". Similar positions have been advocated by representatives of the organization since
Lawrence was decided in 2003. In February 2010, Family Research Council's senior researcher for policy studies, Peter Sprigg, stated on NBC's
Hardball that same-sex behavior should be outlawed and that "criminal sanctions against homosexual behavior" should be enforced. Three months later, in May 2010, Sprigg publicly suggested that repealing the
Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy would encourage molestation of heterosexual service members. In November 2010, Perkins was asked about Sprigg's comments regarding the criminalization of same-sex behavior: he responded that criminalizing homosexuality is not a goal of Family Research Council. Perkins repeated FRC's
association of homosexuals with pedophilia, stating: "If you look at the
American College of Pediatricians, they say the research is overwhelming that homosexuality poses a danger to children." and the likelihood of child molestation by homosexuals and
bisexuals has been found to be no higher than child molestation by
heterosexuals; Some scientists whose work is cited by the socially conservative group the
American College of Pediatricians – which was created following the
American Academy of Pediatrics' endorsement of adoption by same-sex couples and to which FRC points for evidence supporting its positions – have said the organization has distorted or misrepresented their work and the organization has been criticized by
Psychology Today for making "false statements ... that have the potential to harm LGBT youth". The
Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) designated the FRC as a hate group in its Winter 2010
Intelligence Report. In 2017, at the council-sponsored
Values Voter Summit, a tote bag was distributed to all attendees that included a copy of a flyer entitled "The Health Hazards of Homosexuality" written by
MassResistance, which the
SPLC has also designated as a hate group. An
amicus brief submitted in relation to
United States v. Windsor (which struck down part of the
Defense of Marriage Act) argued that DOMA did not discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, and their
amicus brief in
Obergefell v. Hodges argued against same-sex marriage. An article written by Travis Weber, the director of the Council's Center for Religious Liberty, was highly critical of both Supreme Court decisions.
Same-sex marriage cases The FRC, on January 28, 2013, issued an
amicus brief in support of the
Proposition 8 and the
Defense of Marriage Act cases before the Supreme Court, On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court ruled in
United States v. Windsor that the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutionally deprived gay and lesbian couples of liberty, and in
Hollingsworth v. Perry that Proposition 8's proponents had no standing to defend the law, leaving in place a lower-court ruling overturning the ban.
Project 2025 FRC is a member of the advisory board of
Project 2025, a collection of
conservative and
right-wing policy proposals from
the Heritage Foundation to reshape the
United States federal government and consolidate
executive power should the
Republican nominee win the
2024 presidential election. ==Publishing and lobbying activities==