Methodology in rhetoric studies Scholars such as Jessica Enoch and Jaqueline Jones Royster introduced the idea of changing the way research is recognized and constructed. Scholars in rhetoric studies agree there is a plethora of voices and demographics to draw upon for data necessary for research in the field. Researchers suggest this is achieved by asking questions that have never been asked before, recognizing the wealth of materials (or lack thereof) in archives, and expanding the idea of an archive. In recent years, archives have been deconstructed, or critically analyzed, outside of scholarly articles. Feminist rhetorical academics work to develop research methods and methodologies by including new types of archival research such as yearbooks, small-town newspapers, and community-contributing archival websites. To add, some scholars have gone as far as reintroducing the concept of ethos as it pertains to women leading public discourse. Scholars have argued women who are not white, middle class, and heterosexual are challenged in establishing credibility as it pertains to the Aristotelian ethos. Furthermore, scholars offer the concept of feminist ecological ēthe. This concept moves away from the traditional rhetorical device, ethos. This proposed concept identifies women’s ethos as new ways to adopt interrelationality, materiality, and agency. Additionally, intersectional feminist methods can be applied throughout the history of research and writing. However, some scholars argue both approaches have limitations.
Global narratives Feminist rhetoric studies persuasive communication that focuses on the social, political, cultural, and economic inequalities of genders; it also seeks to explain complex issues in women's writing and, in some approaches, connecting feminists ideas across contexts. Specifically, transnational feminists such as Chandra Talpade Mohanty have addressed "how women's lives are shaped by national boundaries and histories of colonialism." Feminist rhetorical scholars ask questions of how rhetoric, writing studies, and social change intersect, or may be influenced by politics, the economy, religions, cultures, and education. A key term used in this field is "
transnationality," defined as the culture of one nation moving through borders to another nation. It is used with the terms cultural hybridity and intertextuality, which continue the theory of cultures, texts, and ideas mixing with one another. Women entering the political space have grown in recent years and they have left quite an impact in what has been known as a male- dominated arena for some time. Rebecca S. Richards provided a body of work titled
"Transnational Feminist Rhetorics and Gendered Leadership in Global Politics : From Daughters of Destiny to Iron Ladies," which provides a framework for transnational feminist rhetoric by examining women world leaders in the political realm. Richard urges female rhetoricians to look beyond the patterns of representation, but rather consider
how those patterns of representation have material effects. Considering the effects, affect elected policy makers, policies, and projects by political leaders. Richard argues this approach is critical to scholarship on transnational feminism. As it directly impacts political leaders and their policies that relate to cross-national contexts and drive local and global economic policies. Scholars Wendy Hesford and Eileen Schell argue the importance of bringing transnationality to the field and call for new methodologies and critical comparative perspectives to bring fresh insights. Their work urges scholars to not view rhetoric studies of transnational as passive recipient of transnational studies. However, the authors argue scholars should examine transnational texts and publics and challenge understandings of nations, nationalism, and citizenship. Royster and others have called for research focused on how gender dynamics affect communication, including rhetoric.
Race and ethnicity Race and ethnicity is an area of focus for several scholars in feminist rhetoric. They have changed research methods to include international races and ethnicity outside the typical rhetoric canon. An issue that has arisen in feminist rhetoric is the discourse of women of color. Some female scholars of color have written about their perceived need to mask their identity when sharing their voices and opinions. Female rhetoric scholars of color have had experiences where they voiced their opinions publicly, and were either challenged or not entitled to comment just because they were part of a marginalized group.
The role of hope Cheryl Glenn, in "The Language of Rhetorical Feminism, Anchored in Hope," argues for a new approach to
rhetoric, one centered on inclusivity and hope, especially for underrepresented voices. Glenn argues for a move toward rhetorical feminism by pointing out how traditional rhetoric has historically silenced women and marginalized groups. This approach values and amplifies these voices, promoting a more equitable and cooperative society. Rebecca Solnit similarly discussed feminist rhetoric as having the power to change and redesign the world, saying it goes beyond just stating injustices, but it actually uses equity as a means of evaluating justice. For Glenn, hope is not simply optimism; it involves actively striving for understanding and inclusivity to triumph over dominance. Glenn’s focus on rhetorical feminism emphasizes empathy and dialogue as tools to foster meaningful participation and challenge patriarchal structures. At the Feminisms and Rhetorics Convention in Dayton, Ohio on October 6th, 2017,
Andrea Lunsford was asked a question on maintaining hope in an interview with Megan Adams and Mariana Grohowski. In addition to interacting with friends and loved ones, Lunsford noted her administrative success of building the writing center at Stanford as a source of hope and gratitude. Lunsford also notes that community and connection sustained her during depressive moments. Kaur’s poetry shows a universal understanding of hope in feminist rhetoric, and a deliberate focus on what it means to be a woman in today’s society for her.
The digital sphere Liz Lane, in her article titled "Feminist Rhetoric in the Digital Sphere: Digital Interventions & the Subversion of Gendered Cultural Scripts," argues that recent feminist rhetoric has created a space that subverts patriarchal structures and allows for the interaction of feminist voices in restrictive spheres. Lane discusses how many of contemporary subversions are made far more public through "the media’s echoing of hashtags, social media’s omnipresence, and the online worlds that these different platforms enable feminist rhetoricians to build." She also discusses the "X+1" model that describes how women must exceed their male counterparts whenever they accomplish something in order to be heard. Lane further discusses how women subvert these power dynamics through physical presence and digital amplification. Throughout the article she reinforces the importance behind social media platforms such as X (formerly Twitter) allowing marginalized groups to amplify their voices but simultaneously are spaces for gendered harassment. Lane underscores this dichotomy by referring to Ellen Pao who was Reddit's interim CEO, who banned and censored popular hate speech subreddits and eventually had to step down from her position due to the harassment she was facing. Lane also emphasizes the embodied nature of feminist rhetoric online, arguing that even in digital spaces, the female body remains a stie of rhetorical contestation. She notes that gendered attacks often target perceived bodily presence, even when speakers appear anonymous. Drawing on classical rhetorical traditions, Lane situates these digital interventions within a longer history of exclusion, referencing Greco-Roman norms that restricted speech to elite males and likening modern feminist tactics to Sophistic subversions of dominant discourse. She introduces the concept of “disruptive technologies” to describe how feminist rhetors use digital tools—especially hashtags—as rhetorical interventions that challenge existing power structures and amplify marginalized voices . Lane cites the #FemFuture report as a key example of collective ethos-building, describing online feminism as a “nervous system” of interconnected voices and actions that can sustain activist momentum despite the volatility of digital platforms. Lane frames the current period as a potential “Fourth Wave” of feminism, using Nancy Hewitt’s “radio wave” metaphor. This model reflects the constant presence of feminist discourse online and highlights the influence of digital activism and call-out culture. == Intersectionality ==