On 8 September 2025, published an interview with Gábor Kuslits, a former official of the Budapest Regional Child Protection Service (Tegyesz), who alleged that Péter Pál Juhász, the former director of the (currently under arrest), had facilitated cases of sexual abuse involving politicians and minors from the institution. In September 2025, an anonymous participant on a podcast hosted by activist
Péter Juhász (no relation to Péter Pál Juhász) had claimed that children in another residential home referred to their abuser as "Zsolt bácsi" ("Uncle Zsolt") and later recognised the voice of a senior politician on television. The title of the podcast,
Who is Uncle Zsolt?, gained traction on social media. On 22 September 2025, during a session of the National Assembly, opposition MP
Gergely Arató (
Democratic Coalition) referenced these allegations by asking Semjén: "Answer, Zsolt Semjén, who is Uncle Zsolti?" Semjén rejected any connection to the allegations, calling them "a character assassination attempt". According to a statement by the
Ministry of Justice, the rumours were being spread as part of a disinformation campaign allegedly linked to journalist Csaba Kánczwho explicitly stated that boys were taken to Zsolt Semjénbased on payments he had received from a foreign company founded by former British intelligence officers between 2012 and 2016. Káncz stated he was unaware that the business intelligence firm was connected to MI6. The later stated that Kuslits was unable to substantiate his claims during questioning and had not provided verifiable evidence. The Ministry of Justice reported that its investigation found no evidence implicating any member of the government in child abuse or trafficking cases. The author of the
Válasz Online article, András Stumpf, subsequently wrote that even though Semjén had often made moralistic statements himself, he must still be protected from unfounded, rumor-based accusations, as fundamental rights and due process apply universally. Stumpf argued that the "Uncle Zsolt" controversy had grown organically out of systemic failures around the Szőlő Street facility, unanswered questions about oversight, opportunistic interpretations, and disinformation, warning that allowing gossip to replace evidence undermines public trust. Independent outlet
444 likewise noted that the government's communication about the affair had created further confusion, citing inconsistencies in official statements, premature declarations about the case's outcome, unclear investigative scope, and concerns about potential political interference and lack of transparency.
Mandiner, a pro-government media outlet, however, pointed out that the source of the controversy was that the reporter of the original
Válasz Online article did not go into details or ask evidence when the politician's name was mentioned, opening gates for speculations. On 20 January 2026, a manpresumed by
444.hu to be Csaba Kánczwas indicted by the Prosecution Service for the
libel of two high-ranking politicians. ==Notes==