The term has existed for a number of years, but was given prominence in the 2005 “
Quadrennial Fire and Fuel Review (QFR),” a publication that examines the future of wildfire in the
United States and provides insight and predictions about potential changes in mission, roles and responsibilities. The 2005 QFR suggested promoting “fire-adapted human communities, rather than escalating protection of communities at risk in the
wildland-urban interface.” The ultimate aim would build toward the goal of a greater “sense of living with fire within communities,” and “establishing responsible partnerships with communities.” The
2009 QFR also says the notion that “the
government will always be there” (p. 32, 2009 QFR) during a wildfire needs to be changed to a model where
property owners and local agencies “take responsibility and become active participants and an integral part” in curbing the effects of wildfire to communities. (p. 21, 2009 QFR.) “As some
ecosystems must adapt to a fire-prone environment in order to survive, so must human communities in the interface, if they are to survive over the long-term.” The 2009 QFR further examined the characteristics of fire-adapted communities. “The premise is that all partners recognize a general set of common operating precepts: namely, fulfilling pre-fire mitigation,
defensible space, and individual responsibilities, applicable regulations; and providing a robust local response capacity … Other key steps include building community defensible space or fuels reduction zones … as an essential component of a larger integrated fuels management portfolio …” ==Reducing risks==