The
Fugal Overture met with a mixed reception in the 1920s and 1930s.
The Musical Times found it "splendidly amusing",
The Times enjoyed its "lively rhythms and vivid colour", but on another occasion compared it unfavourably to the
Fugal Concerto, saying it had "less ideas in it...and such as it has have been better expressed by the composer before". R. W. S. Mendl called it "an exhilarating piece of fun from beginning to end", but
Dyneley Hussey complained that both the
Overture and Holst's almost contemporaneous
Fugal Concerto were "[p]erverse exercises in the contrapuntal style, devoid of any warmth and...real vitality". Later unfavourable judgements came from normally friendly critics. Holst's daughter
Imogen considered it "unsatisfactory", finding only in the central section a "merciful deliverance" from the "noise" of the fugue, which assaulted the ear; and
Ralph Vaughan Williams, discussing Holst's music, admitted that it was "not one of [his] favourite works". But there was also much praise.
The Times, reviewing a 1956 performance by Boult, thought he made a cogent case for it as "an invigorating work that could effectively start any symphony concert".
William Mann in 1967 thought it "exhilarating". In 1974
Hugh Ottaway, in
The Musical Times, wrote that though it was not a major achievement it was a lively piece, "well worth hearing from time to time in place of some of the more hackneyed 'starters'." In more recent years it has been called "bracingly exuberant", and "a thrilling little piece...which feels like a 1920s equivalent of
Short Ride in a Fast Machine." == Recordings ==