Fork-marked lemurs were first documented in 1839 by
Henri Marie Ducrotay de Blainville when he
described the
Masoala fork-marked lemur (
P. furcifer) as
Lemur furcifer. The
holotype is thought to be MNHN 1834-136, a female specimen taken from Madagascar by French naturalist
Jules Goudot. The source of this specimen is unknown, but thought to be
Antongil Bay. In 1850,
Isidore Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire moved the fork-marked lemurs to the genus
Cheirogaleus (
dwarf lemurs), but they were also commonly listed in the genus
Microcebus (
mouse lemurs). In 1870,
John Edward Gray assigned fork-marked lemurs to their own genus,
Phaner, after initially including them and the mouse lemurs in the genus
Lepilemur (
sportive lemurs). Although French naturalist
Alfred Grandidier accepted Gray's new genus (while also lumping the other cheirogaleids in
Cheirogaleus and illustrating the
cranial similarities between cheirogaleids and
Lepilemur) in 1897, the genus
Phaner was not widely accepted. In the early 1930s,
Ernst Schwarz,
Guillaume Grandidier, and others resurrected the name, citing characteristics that were intermediate between
Cheirogaleus and
Microcebus. Until the late 20th century, there was only one recognized species of fork-marked lemur, although size and coloration differences had been noted previously. After comparing museum specimens, paleoanthropologist
Ian Tattersall and physical anthropologist
Colin Groves recognized three new subspecies in 1991: the
Pale fork-marked lemur (
P. f. pallescens),
Pariente's fork-marked lemur (
P. f. parienti), and the
Amber Mountain fork-marked lemur (
P. f. electromontis). In 2001, Groves elevated all four subspecies to species status based on noticeable color, size, and body proportion differences between the fragmented populations. Although Tattersall disagreed with this promotion, citing inadequate information for the decision, the arrangement is generally accepted. In December 2010,
Russell Mittermeier of
Conservation International and conservation geneticist
Edward E. Louis Jr. announced the possibility of a new species of fork-marked lemur in the protected area of
Daraina in northeast Madagascar. In October, a specimen was observed, captured, and released, although genetic tests have yet to determine if it is a new species. The specimen demonstrated a slightly different color pattern from other fork-marked lemur species. If shown to be a new species, they plan to name it after
Fanamby, a key conservation organization working in that protected forest.
Etymology The etymology of the genus
Phaner puzzled researchers for many years. Gray often created mysterious and unexplained
taxonomic names. In 1904,
Theodore Sherman Palmer attempted to document the etymologies of all mammalian taxa, but could not definitively explain the origins of the generic name
Phaner, noting only that it derived from the
Greek φανερός (
phaneros) meaning "visible, evident". In 2012, Alex Dunkel, Jelle Zijlstra, and Groves attempted to solve the mystery. Following some initial speculation, a search of the general literature published around 1870 revealed the source: the British comedy
The Palace of Truth by
W. S. Gilbert, which premiered in London on 19 November 1870, nearly one and a half weeks prior to the date written on the preface of Gray's manuscript (also published in London). The comedy featured characters bearing three names: King Phanor (sic), Mirza, and Azema. Since the genera
Mirza (
giant mouse lemurs) and
Azema (for
M. rufus, now a synonym for
Microcebus) were both described in the same publication and equally enigmatic, the authors concluded that Gray had seen the comedy and then based the names of three lemur genera on its characters. Fork-marked lemurs were called "fork-marked dwarf lemurs" by
Henry Ogg Forbes in 1894 and "fork-crowned mouse lemur" by English missionary and naturalist
James Sibree in 1895. Literature searches by Dunkel
et al. also uncovered other names, such as "fork-lined lemur" and "squirrel lemur", during the early 1900s. By the 1970s, reference to dwarf and mouse lemurs had ended, and the "fork-crowned" prefix became popular between 1960 and 2001. Since then, the "fork-marked" prefix has become more widely used. These lemurs get their
common name from the distinctive forked stripe on their head.
Evolution }} |1= |2= }} }} }} Within the family
Cheirogaleidae, fork-marked lemurs are the most
phylogenetically distinct, although their placement remained uncertain until recently. One uniting characteristic (
synapomorphy) among all cheirogaleids, to the exclusion of other lemurs, is the branching of the
carotid artery along with how it enters the skull—a trait which is shared by fork-marked lemurs. Analyses based on
morphology,
immunology, and
repetitive DNA have given contradictory placements of
Phaner, while studies in 2001 and 2008 either lacked data or yielded poor resolution of their placement. A study in 2009 of seven
mitochondrial genes (mtDNA) and three
nuclear genes grouped fork-marked lemurs with sportive lemurs (family Lepilemuridae), offering a host of explanations, such as a possible hybridization (
introgression) following the initial split between the families. A study published in 2013 also grouped fork-marked lemurs with sportive lemurs when it used 43 morphological traits and mtDNA. If correct, this would make the family Cheirogaleidae
paraphyletic. Broad agreement between two
lemur phylogeny studies—one in 2004 using
SINE analysis and another in 2012 using
multilocus phylogenetic tests—gave strong support for a
sister group relationship between fork-marked lemurs and the rest of the cheirogaleids and a more distant relationship with sportive lemurs. The split between
Phaner and the rest of the cheirogaleids is thought to have occurred approximately 38
mya (million years ago), not long after the
radiation of most of the major lemur groups on Madagascar, roughly 43 mya. ==Description==