From August 2007 Heffermehl marked himself as a staunch critic of the
Norwegian Nobel Committee, which, according to Heffermehl, has failed to comply with the
will of
Alfred Nobel,—juridically illegal. Among the laureates perceived by Heffermehl as illegal are the more controversial laureates, such as
Henry Kissinger and
Le Duc Tho (1973) and
Arafat,
Peres and
Rabin (1994), but also less controversial ones such as
Mother Teresa (1979) and
Elie Wiesel (1986). Although many laureates have done "commendable work", Heffermehl stressed that this is not good enough to receive a prize whose criteria explicitly pertain to disarmament and peace work. His views were first explained in depth in the 2008 book
Nobels vilje (English: "Nobel's Will"). Since 1948, the selection of members of the Nobel Committee has been delegated from the
Parliament of Norway (against what Nobel prescribed) to the major political parties. According to Heffermehl, the
Norwegian political parties have used committee membership as an award to over-the-hill politicians in recognition of their service, found that the broad pro-NATO consensus among Norwegian political parties has skewed the Nobel Peace Prize in a similar direction. In
Nobels vilje, Heffermehl regretted that Eide had not been hired as Nobel Committee secretary when she actually applied for that position in 1990. In November 2023, the book
The Real Nobel Peace Prize. A Squandered Opportunity to Abolish War was published. It is based on in-depth studies of the locked-down archives of the Norwegian Nobel Institute.
Gunnar Garbo, and
Johan Galtung, among others. -->
Criticism of Norwegian parliament distorting Nobel's intention In the autumn of 2010 Heffermehl published a critical study,
The Nobel Peace Prize. What Nobel really wanted. The aim was to look into the methods used by the Norwegian establishment to repress his rediscovery of the content of the prize for "the champions of peace" named in the 1895 will of Alfred Nobel. Nobel made a choice between two fundamentally different ways forward for humanity, either continuing to seek peace by military means or by co-operation on international law, institutions, and disarmament. When Parliament and the Nobel Committee ignored his views and declared that no one supported his interpretation, Heffermehl set out to prove them wrong. He found that numerous academic and other works over the years had expressed the same views on the role of Bertha von Suttner and that Nobel intended to support the antimilitarist peace movement. This made it necessary to use the fate of the Peace Prize for a case study of the distortion of Nobel's testament and how Parliament had managed the prize entrusted to them by Nobel. ==Death==