Taxonomy and phylogeny The distinction between prokaryotes and
eukaryotes was established by the microbiologists
Roger Stanier and
C. B. van Niel in their 1962 paper
The concept of a bacterium (though spelled procaryote and eucaryote there). That paper cites
Édouard Chatton's 1937 book
Titres et Travaux Scientifiques for using those terms and recognizing the distinction. One reason for this classification was so that the group then often called
blue-green algae (now
cyanobacteria) would not be classified as
plants but grouped with bacteria. Knowledge of prokaryote taxonomy is rapidly changing in the 21st century with the
sequencing of large numbers of genomes, many of these without the isolation of cultures of the organisms involved. As of 2021, consensus had not been reached among taxonomists to rely exclusively on genomes as opposed to existing practices, describing species from cultures. According to the 2016 phylogenetic analysis of Laura Hug and colleagues, using genomic data on over 1,000 organisms, the relationships among prokaryotes are as shown in the tree diagram. Bacteria dominate the diversity of organisms, shown at left, top, and right in the diagram; the archaea are shown bottom centre, and the eukaryotes in the small green area at bottom right. As represented by red dots on the diagram, there are multiple major lineages where no representative has been isolated: such lineages are common in both bacteria (such as
Omnitrophica and
Wirthbacteria) and archaea (such as
Parvarchaeota and
Lokiarchaeota). At the lower levels (species to class) and up to the level of phylum, the data provide strong support for the groupings, but the deepest (oldest) branches of the phylogeny are more uncertain. s. Both eukaryotes and prokaryotes contain
ribosomes which
produce proteins as specified by the cell's DNA. Prokaryote ribosomes are smaller than those in eukaryote cytoplasm, but similar to those inside
mitochondria and
chloroplasts, one of several lines of evidence that those organelles derive from bacteria incorporated by
symbiogenesis. The
genome in a prokaryote is held within a DNA/protein complex in the
cytosol called the
nucleoid, which lacks a
nuclear envelope. The complex contains a single
circular chromosome, a cyclic, double-stranded molecule of stable chromosomal DNA, in contrast to the multiple linear, compact, highly organized
chromosomes found in eukaryotic cells. In addition, many important genes of prokaryotes are stored in separate circular DNA structures called plasmids. Like eukaryotes, prokaryotes may partially duplicate genetic material, and can have a
haploid chromosomal composition that is
partially replicated. Prokaryotes lack
mitochondria and chloroplasts. Instead, processes such as
oxidative phosphorylation and photosynthesis take place across the prokaryotic cell membrane. Prokaryotes possess some internal structures, such as
prokaryotic cytoskeletons. It was previously suggested that the bacterial phylum
Planctomycetota has a membrane around the nucleoid and contains other membrane-bound cellular structures. Further investigation revealed that Planctomycetota cells are not compartmentalized or nucleated and, like other bacterial membrane systems, are interconnected. Prokaryotic cells are usually much smaller than eukaryotic cells. This causes prokaryotes to have a larger
surface-area-to-volume ratio, giving them a higher
metabolic rate, a higher growth rate, and as a consequence, a shorter generation time than eukaryotes.
Eukaryotes as Archaea group which represents a modern version of the
eocyte hypothesis. In this view, the division between bacteria and the rest is what groups organisms into the two major domains. There is increasing evidence that the roots of the eukaryotes are to be found in the archaean
Asgard group, perhaps
Heimdallarchaeota. A proposed non-bacterial group comprising Archaea and Eukaryota was called
Neomura by
Thomas Cavalier-Smith in 2002. Another view is that the most important difference between
biota may be the division between Bacteria and the rest (Archaea and Eukaryota). Further,
ATP synthase, though homologous in all organisms, differs greatly between bacteria (including eukaryotic
organelles such as mitochondria and chloroplasts) and the archaea/eukaryote nucleus group. The last common ancestor of all life (called
LUCA) should have possessed an early version of this protein complex. As ATP synthase is obligate membrane bound, this supports the assumption that LUCA was a cellular organism. The
RNA world hypothesis might clarify this scenario, as LUCA might have lacked DNA, but had an RNA genome built by ribosomes as
suggested by Woese. A
ribonucleoprotein world has been proposed based on the idea that
oligopeptides may have been built together with primordial nucleic acids at the same time, which supports the concept of a
ribocyte as LUCA. The feature of DNA as the material base of the genome might have then been adopted separately in bacteria and in archaea (and later eukaryote nuclei), presumably with the help of some viruses (possibly
retroviruses as they could
reverse transcribe RNA to DNA). == See also ==