The
review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes reported that 25% of critics have given the film a positive review based on 8 reviews, with an average rating of 3.58/10.
Metacritic, another review aggregator, gave it a weighted average score of 32 out of 100 based on 4 reviews, indicating "generally unfavorable reviews". André Crous of
The Prague Post wrote, "The decision to add a real cannibal to the mix won't push it into the realm of terror that
Cannibal Holocaust or even
The Blair Witch Project occupy, but it does help drive the story when there is little else happening." Justin Lowe of
The Hollywood Reporter called it "derivative, uninspired material" that requires "an inordinate amount of patience" for any payoff.
Maitland McDonagh of
Film Journal International wrote, "And while
Ghoul doesn't exactly crackle, it is remarkably creepy, even if it's hard to work up a lot of initial sympathy for the callow, smug young filmmakers". Martin Tsai of the
Los Angeles Times wrote, "
Ghoul can't decide whether it should be about cannibals, serial killers, ghosts or demons". Michael Gingold of
Fangoria rated it 1.5/5 stars and wrote that it "ultimately offers nothing new to the supernatural/mock-doc horror subgenres". Rob Staeger of
The Village Voice wrote that characters are difficult to distinguish, but it "rewards attention for much of its running time with subtle scares and growing unease, before squandering it in a shaky chase through twisted corridors that goes nowhere unexpected." Pat Torfe of
Bloody Disgusting rated it 2/5 stars and wrote, "Despite it being a hit in its native Czech Republic,
Ghoul fails at being nothing more than a rip-off of the films that have come before it (and have done it MUCH better)." Martin Kudlac of
Twitch Film wrote, "An incremental step for the genre, but a big jump for Petr Jákl,
Ghoul proves that a domestic production can be carried out and achieve international standards, and can even be vital enough to beat the competition." It won the Vicious Cat Award at the
Grossmann film and wine festival. == References ==