, bows before
Shalmaneser III. This is "the only portrayal we have in ancient Near Eastern art of an Israelite or Judaean monarch". , son of
Omri". The second
register from the top is thought to include the earliest surviving picture of a biblical figure. The name appears as
mIa-ú-a mar mHu-um-ri-i.
Rawlinson's original translation in 1850 seminal work "On the Inscriptions of Assyria and Babylonia" stated: "The second line of offerings are said to have been sent by Yahua, son of Hubiri, a prince of whom there is no mention in the annals, and of whose native country, therefore, I am ignorant" Over a year later, a connection with the bible was made by Reverend
Edward Hincks, who wrote in his diary on 21 August 1851: "Thought of an identification of one of the obelisk captives — with Jehu, king of Israel, and satisfying myself on the point wrote a letter to the Athenaeum announcing it". Hincks' letter was published by
Athenaeum on the same day, entitled "Nimrud Obelisk". Hincks' identification is now the commonly held position by biblical archaeologists. The identification of "Yahua" as
Jehu was questioned by contemporary scholars such as
George Smith as well as in more recent times by P. Kyle McCarter and
Edwin R. Thiele, The caption above the scene, written in Assyrian cuneiform, can be translated: File:The Assyrian king Shalmaneser III receives tribute from Sua, king of Gilzanu, The Black Obelisk..JPG|The Neo-Assyrian king
Shalmaneser III receives tribute from Sua, king of Gilzanu, The Black Obelisk. File:Black Obelisk side 4 Jewish delegation.jpg|Part of the gift-bearing Israelite delegation of King Jehu, Black Obelisk, 841–840 BCE. File:Jehu on the Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III.jpg| ==Casts and replicas==