Analysis Author Veronika Mayer argues that "whereas the 1931 version is regarded as a lesbian classic in queer German cinema, the 1958 remake, however, is not even considered part of the lesbian genre." She further states that the 1958 version treats lesbian themes with much greater caution. The 1950s adaptation can be explained by the social and political climate of the time, characterized by a societal demand for a retreat into traditional, patriarchal values. Radványi's film deliberately ignored the lesbian themes of the 1930s version while attempting to profit from its reputation. Even with major stars Romy Schneider and Lily Palmer, it underperformed compared to the original. This lack of success stemmed from the narrative changes made to suit the conservative notions of the 1950s, specifically by minimizing the source material's rebellious edge and lesbian elements in favor of heterosexual and patriarchal repression. Author Petruta Tatulescu contends that despite a kiss shared between Ms.von Bernburg and Manuela, their connection is defined less by physical attraction than by a subtle, unspoken understanding. Ms. von Bernburg's true feelings for her student remain ambiguous; while affection is evident, definitive proof of deeper romantic love is absent from the narrative. Tatulescu notes there is no reference to sex or being gay in the film; "there is no real lesbian environment and thus no lesbian life; so lesbian life takes place at a platonic level if at all."
Reception Film critic Foumy Saisho wrote "the film handles with intelligence and considerable insight the central problem which has a fleeting suggestion of homosexuality; Manuela's possessive affection for Fraulein Bernburg does look very much like a case of homosexuality, and none of the details is spared in the film to blur that impression.
Variety Magazine opined that this "remake is a disappointment for the generation able to recall the original, but should have some appeal to those to whom the subject is fresh; black and white photography would have helped in establishing the sombre discipline that prevails in the girls school; the use of color strikes a false glamour note." Critic Michael Atkinson commented that "Radványi's post-war reboot doesn't approach the seething cataclysms of the original, partially because it's a more modern film; the degree of Euro-polish at hand doesn't abet the material either — the film was shot in Eastmancolor but with the antiseptic, pastel sheen so many mid-century German films had. Even so, Romy Schneider and Lilli Palmer are convincingly dewy and racked with sexual tension." American film critic
Bosley Crowther opined that "the 1931 version is vital and truthful where this one is pallid and slick and the old one breathes the air of German culture where this one breathes the air of Hollywood." He went on to state the "lesbianism in the original is told much more frankly and realistically, and dwelled upon, but here in this one, the nature of the attachment is merely sympathetic and sweet; the affection does not go beyond a light kiss on the cheek." ==References==