Because many of the writings on Drexel 4302 appeared before Ruby Reid Thompson's 1992 and 2001 articles discrediting a single copyist for Drexel 4302 and Egerton 3665, writers often made comparisons between the two manuscripts. Much of the music from the early 17th century, whether printed or in manuscript, is available only in parts.
Edward Lowinsky observed that Drexel 4302 (along with Egerton 3665 and
R.M. 24 d.2 in the
British Library) provided evidence for the dissemination of the new practice of using scores in early 17th century England. Bertram Schofield and Thurston Dart noted that both Drexel 4302 and Egerton 3665 consist primarily of English and Italian madrigals. They observed that a marginal note in Egerton 3665 regarding the setting
Italia mia ("ex libris Henr. 8, circa annum 1520") is the same note found in a marginal note of an anonymous motet of Drexel 4302 and conclude that the same source was used for the fantasies by Philip van Wilder. Richard Charteris noted that one of the significant features of Drexel 4302 (and Egerton 3665) are the designations of the three composers named Alfonso Ferrabosco (
Alfonso Ferrabosco the elder (1543–1588),
Alfonso Ferrabosco the younger (1575–1628) and
Alfonso Ferrabosco III (junior) (died 1652)). Both Egerton 3665 and Drexel 4302 indicate "il padre" and "il figliuolo" in titles and "Alfonso Ferrabosco senior" and "Alfonso Ferrabosco junior" for individual pieces. In his study of the song
Amarilli, mia bella and its transmission, Tim Carter noted the importance to Drexel 4302 of publications from the publishing firm Phalesius. The firm was founded in the 16th century by
Petrus Phalesius the Elder, whose sons continued it in the 17th century (at the time the manuscript would have been copied). Carter noted that all publications of composer
Peter Philips were printed by Phalesius, and that he edited one of Phalesius' anthologies, implying a close relationship between composer and the firm. These publications were significant sources to the copyists of Drexel 4302. Carter posits that the copyist of Drexel 4302 apparently knew Phalesius' 1601 anthology because the manuscript includes arrangements of eight six-part madrigals from the publication. Carter observed that both Drexel 4302 and Egerton 3665 were important to the transmission of "Amarilli, mia bella." The song was first published in
Ghirlanda di madrigalia sei voci, di diversie eccellentissimi autori de nostri tempi, raccolta di giardini di fiori odoriferi musicali issued in 1601 by the Antwerp printer
Petrus Phalesius the Younger (RISM 16015). Carter noted that the copyist of Drexel 4302 copied
Amarilli, mia bella on pages 502–18 (nos. 105–15). This copyist created a three-part setting of the work by taking only three of the six parts. Carter observed that this procedure noting some "curious gaps" in the voicing. Rather than copy out the slightly altered repeat, the copyist substituted repeat signs, resulting in an ending that Carter terms "unworkable." == List of contents ==