Influences The Golden Madonna is both the oldest known sculpture of the Madonna and the oldest free-standing sculpture north of the Alps. It is also one of only two extant medieval gilded
cult images. Gilded sculptures are frequently mentioned in medieval documents, but apart from an image of Saint
Fides in the abbey of
Saint-Foy in
Conques in Southern France not many of those artifacts survive. We know Charlemagne had a life-size crucifix with the figure of Christ in gold in his
Palatine Chapel in Aachen, the oldest such object to be described, and many similar figures in precious metal, all now vanished, are recorded in large Anglo-Saxon churches and elsewhere. Most often they are crucifixes, and sometimes accompanying figures of Mary and
John the Evangelist are mentioned, as for example those by
Spearhafoc in the 11th century. The fact that the Essen statue is free-standing and its enamel eyes point to the influence of
Byzantine art and its spreading to the Holy Roman Empire after the marriage of Emperor
Otto II with the Byzantine princess
Theophanu in 972, although statues on this large scale were completely outside Byzantine traditions after the
Byzantine iconoclasm. The overall form of the Madonna indicates that the sculptor was not experienced in carving free-standing sculptures, since profile, front and rear view do not match up to a harmonic whole.
Religious and political significance Like many medieval works of art, the Madonna displays a very complex
iconography. The statue shows the Virgin in a rather plain gown, while the oversized Christ child figure in her lap wears a precious pontifical gown. The size is meant to illustrate the importance of Christ as redeemer. In contrast Mary is depicted in a serving role, in accordance with
Luke 1:38:
And Mary said, Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to thy word. At the same time she embodies the
Seat of Wisdom as the Throne of Solomon is described in
1 Kings 10:18:
Moreover the king made a great throne of ivory, and overlaid it with the best gold. Sitting on her lap is the Christ child, whose ornate
chasuble betokens his significance as ruler of the heavens, the book his role as herald of the faith. Bearing in mind other medieval portrayals of Christ as teacher, it may be supposed that the child's lost right arm was originally raised in a gesture of blessing. However, Christ's face is turned towards his mother, while from any position Mary's look seems directed towards the beholder. Thus Mary may arguably not only be interpreted as a passive devotee but also assumes the role of mediator between the people and the Redeemer. There are several possible interpretations for the orb Mary is holding in her right hand. It has been construed as the
globus cruciger of the Holy Roman Empire. However, a
globus cruciger is not attested as part of the Holy Roman regalia until the coronation of
Conrad II in 1024, and besides in the habitual depiction of the
globus cruciger the orb is always shown held by the full hand and all fingers, not just three. It is therefore safer to interpret the orb as an "apple of salvation" —in much the same way as
Eve held the apple of damnation plucked from the
Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, Mary now proffers the beholder an apple symbolizing the redemption she has brought to the world by incarnating Christ. She thus appears as "the New Eve". Another interpretation of the orb is akin to the
globus-cruciger theory. While such an object may not have been part of the coronation ceremony of the Holy Roman Empire until the next century, the idea of an orb symbolizing power over the
Mundus, i.e. the world, was well known by the time the sculpture was crafted. Depictions of this symbol of power can be found in
Carolingian and
Ottonian illuminated manuscripts. According to this theory then, Mary is holding the whole world in her hands, and she is holding it on behalf of the one who is in fact its sovereign, i.e. the infant in her lap. The image of a mother holding the power over the world for her son may have had far-reaching political implications at the time of the sculpture's creation. Emperor Otto II, uncle to Mathilde, the then abbess of Essen, died in 983 in Rome, leaving as heir to the throne only his son Otto, a child of three years. Until her death in 991, Otto's mother Theophanu served as regent for her underage son and defended his title against the claims of
Henry the Quarrelsome, formerly Duke of Bavaria and male next of kin to Otto. The Madonna could thus be construed as an expression of Theophanu's insistence on being,
by the Grace of God, the rightful sovereign of the Empire until her son would be of age. Consequently, it may be inferred that Theophanu in fact donated the sculpture to Essen Abbey. In the struggle for the throne, Mathilde most probably took the side of Otto and Theophanu. Mathilde's family line had a long history of rivalry to Henry's, and she was the personal heiress to her brother
Otto (d. 982), who in 976 had been granted the Dukedom of Bavaria after Henry's revolt. This would further suggest that the eventual Emperor
Otto III may have donated the “Child’s crown” of the treasury on his visit to the abbey out of gratitude for its loyalty in the power struggle that took place when he was a mere child. ==Liturgical significance, past and present==