Entropic gravity, as proposed by Verlinde in his original article, reproduces the
Einstein field equations and, in a Newtonian approximation, a \ \tfrac{\ 1\ }{ r }\ potential for gravitational forces. Since its results do not differ from Newtonian gravity except in regions of extremely small gravitational fields, testing the theory with Earth-based laboratory experiments does not appear feasible. Spacecraft-based experiments performed at
Lagrangian points within the
Solar System would be expensive and challenging. Even so, entropic gravity in its current form has been severely challenged on formal grounds.
Matt Visser has shown that the attempt to model conservative forces in the general Newtonian case (i.e. for arbitrary potentials and an unlimited number of discrete masses) leads to unphysical requirements for the required entropy and involves an unnatural number of temperature baths of differing temperatures. Visser concludes: For the derivation of Einstein's equations from an entropic gravity perspective, Tower Wang shows that the inclusion of energy-momentum conservation and cosmological homogeneity and isotropy requirements severely restricts a wide class of potential modifications of entropic gravity, some of which have been used to generalize entropic gravity beyond the singular case of an entropic model of Einstein's equations. Wang asserts that: Cosmological observations using available technology can be used to test the theory. On the basis of lensing by the galaxy cluster Abell 1689, Nieuwenhuizen concludes that EG is strongly ruled out unless additional (dark) matter-like eV neutrinos is added. A team from
Leiden Observatory statistically observing the
lensing effect of gravitational fields at large distances from the centers of more than 33,000 galaxies found that those gravitational fields were consistent with Verlinde's theory. Using conventional gravitational theory, the fields implied by these observations (as well as from measured
galaxy rotation curves) could only be ascribed to a particular distribution of
dark matter. In June 2017, a study by
Princeton University researcher Kris Pardo asserted that Verlinde's theory is inconsistent with the observed rotation velocities of
dwarf galaxies. Another theory of entropy based on geometric considerations (Quantitative Geometrical Thermodynamics, QGT) provides an entropic basis for the holographic principle and also offers another explanation for galaxy rotation curves as being due to the entropic influence
Entropic gravity and quantum coherence Another criticism of entropic gravity is that entropic processes should, as critics argue, break
quantum coherence. There is no theoretical framework quantitatively describing the strength of such decoherence effects, though. The temperature of the gravitational field in the earth's gravity well is very small (on the order of 10 K). Experiments with ultra-cold neutrons in the gravitational field of Earth are claimed to show that neutrons lie on discrete levels exactly as predicted by the
Schrödinger equation considering the gravitation to be a conservative potential field without any decoherent factors. Archil Kobakhidze argues that this result disproves entropic gravity, while Chaichian
et al. suggest a potential loophole in the argument in weak gravitational fields such as those affecting Earth-bound experiments. ==See also==