(brown). Part of the area marked as Gadsden Purchase near modern-day
Mesilla, New Mexico, was disputed after the Treaty. In addition to the sale of land, the treaty also provided recognition of the Rio Grande as the boundary between the state of Texas and Mexico. The land boundaries were established by a survey team of appointed Mexican and American representatives,
Community property rights in California and other western states are based on the
Visigothic Code which Spain adopted and then brought to the Americas, including the former territories of Mexico that were ceded to the U.S. Although each state had different motivations for adopting the Spanish approach, one common driver was that it was already in place in the region for many years. According to a 2011 assessment, changing to a common law system for marital property "would have been nothing short of a revolution".
Land gained by the United States File:Gilman (United States (after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo)) 1848 UTA.jpg|thumb|300px|E. Gilman,
[United States (after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo)], 1848 The United States received the territories of
Alta California and
Santa Fe de Nuevo México. Today they comprise some or all of the U.S. states of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming. While this land was vast in area, most of it was very sparsely populated, inhabited mostly by
Indigenous Americans, rather than white Americans or Mexicans.
Additional issues Additional issues stemming from the treaty included contention over slavery, border disputes with Mexico, mapping difficulties, cross-border incursions by both nations, community land grant claims, and water rights assignment between the two nations. Disputes about whether to make all this new territory into
slave states or free states, including
Bleeding Kansas, contributed heavily to the rise in North–South tensions that led to the
American Civil War just over a decade later. Following the signing of the treaty, border disputes continued, with the United States sending envoy
James Gadsden to negotiate the sale of additional territory to the US. In 1853, American
filibuster William Walker led an unauthorized expedition into
Baja California and
Sonora, proclaiming the short-lived
Republic of Lower California with the aim of being annexed by the United States. Although Walker's unrecognized state collapsed in January 1854, Mexican president
Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna continued to see the US as a threat amid Mexico's persisting economic problems. Desiring to stave off American expansionist desires as well as alleviate domestic financial problems, Santa Anna sought to sell an area as small as possible to the US for as much money as possible, leading to the controversial $15 million
Gadsden Purchase in 1854. The border commission also faced many difficulties in mapping out the boundary, with the surveying process lasting over 7 years. The work of the commission was hampered by a multitude of issues including: transportation difficulties, unforgiving terrain, extreme weather, inaccurate information and negotiations with Indigenous Americans who had not been considered in the prior treaty negotiations. The
Channel Islands of California and
Farallon Islands are not mentioned in the Treaty. The armed forces of both countries routinely crossed the border. Mexican and
Confederate troops often clashed during the American Civil War, and the United States crossed the border during the war of
second French intervention in Mexico. In March 1916,
Pancho Villa led a raid on the U.S. border town of
Columbus, New Mexico, which was followed by
the Pershing expedition. The shifting of the Rio Grande since the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe caused a dispute over the boundary between the states of New Mexico and Texas, a case referred to as the
Country Club Dispute that was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1927. Controversy over community land grant claims in
New Mexico persists to this day. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo led to the establishment in 1889 of the
International Boundary and Water Commission to maintain the border and, according to newer treaties, to allocate river waters between the two nations and to provide for flood control and water sanitation. Once viewed as a model of international cooperation, in recent decades, the IBWC has been heavily criticized as an institutional anachronism, bypassed by modern social, environmental, and political issues. Writing many years later, Nicholas Trist would describe the Treaty as "a thing for every right-minded American to be ashamed of". ==See also==