Endovascular coiling is typically used to treat
cerebral aneurysms. The main goal is prevention of rupture in unruptured aneurysms, and prevention of rebleeding in ruptured aneurysms by limiting blood circulation to the aneurysm space. Clinically, packing density is recommended to be 20-30% or more of the aneurysm's volume, typically requiring deployment of multiple wires. Higher volumes may be difficult due to the delicate nature of the aneurysm; intraoperative rupture rates are as high as 7.6% for this procedure. In ruptured aneurysms, coiling is performed quickly after rupture because of the high risk of rebleeding within the first few weeks after initial rupture. The patients most suitable for endovascular coiling are those with aneurysms with a small neck size (preferably <4 mm),
luminal diameter <25 mm, and those that are distinct from the parent vessel. Larger aneurysms are subject to compaction of coils, due to both looser packing densities (more coils are needed) and increased blood flow. Coil compaction renders them unsuitable as they are incapable of stemming blood flow. Due to its less invasive nature, endovascular coiling usually presents faster recovery times than surgical clipping, with one study finding a significant decrease in probability of death or dependency compared to a neurosurgical population. Complication rates for coiling as well are generally found to be lower than
microsurgery (11.7% and 17.6% for coiling and microsurgery, respectively). Despite this, intraoperative rupture rates for coiling have been documented as being as high as 7.6%. Reported recurrence rates are quite varied, with rates between 20 and 50% of aneurysms recurring within one year of coiling, and with the recurrence rate increasing with time. These results are similar to those previously reported by other endovascular groups. Other studies have questioned whether new matrix coils work better than bare platinum coils. The
International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial tested the efficacy of endovascular coiling against the traditional micro-surgical clipping. The study initially found very favorable results for coiling, however its results and methodology were criticized. Since the study's release in 2002, and again in 2005, some studies have found higher recurrence rates with coiling, while others have concluded that there is no clear consensus between which procedure is preferred. ==Risks==