Bebb v. The Law Society
In 1913, forty years after women first tried to become practicing professional lawyers, Bebb became the first named party for the reported case,
Bebb v. The Law Society. She was represented by
Stanley Buckmaster KC and
R. A. Wright, instructed by
Withers, Bensons, Birkett & Davies when her test case was heard in the
Chancery Division on 2 and 3 July 1913, before Mr Justice
Joyce, seeking a declaration that she was a "person" within the meaning of the Solicitors Act 1843 as amended, and was therefore entitled to be admitted to the preliminary examination of the Law Society. ruled in
Bebb in 1914 that women were incapable of carrying out a public function in
common law. The judge also stated that this disability must remain "unless and until" Parliament changed the law; in other words, that women could not be solicitors because no woman had ever been a solicitor. She was represented by
Lord Robert Cecil KC and R. A. Wright when the decision was upheld in the
Court of Appeal in December 1913, heard by the
Master of the Rolls Lord Cozens-Hardy, Lord Justice
Swinfen Eady and Lord Justice
Phillimore (included in the law reports in 1914), a key statement in the Court's view was the "long uniform and interrupted usage, which we ought … to be very loth to depart from" that only men had become solicitors, therefore women were not able to do so. Bebb continued with political and feminist activism. The publicity from her case – the press was mostly in her favour – helped the campaign for women's admission to the legal profession in Britain, and the passage of the
Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act 1919 allowed women to be lawyers. ==Later life, death and legacy==