Several of the skeletal characters of
Haasiophis may be interpreted as an indication that
Haasiophis is a juvenile specimen of
Pachyrhachis. The small overall size, underdevelopment of the tarsal ossifications, less extensive pachyostosis, and larger proportional size of the tibia and fibula are all possible traits of a juvenile. However the skull and tooth structures of
Pachyrhachis and
Haasiophis are markedly different. The
neural spines of
Pachyrhachis are much taller in comparison and the rib shape is quite distinct. Therefore, while regarded as very closely related, the two are different genera. Based on
cladistic analysis of skull features,
Haasiophis and its sister genera are indicated as either a sister group to, or basal members of, the
macrostomatan clade of snakes. This is supported by the general characteristics of the skeleton. The presence of the hind limbs presents a problem with this placement however. There are two major ideas for the presence of hind limbs in
Pachyophiidae. The first is the secondary regaining of the limbs from legless ancestors, while the second is the possibility of multiple episodes of leg loss in snakes. Unfortunately the current number of specimens from the family Pachyophiidae, and the complexity of snake
evolutionary
taxonomy are not enough to favor one option over the other. ==See also==