Hare–Clark electoral system

Thomas Hare (1806–1891) is generally credited with the conception of the single transferable vote, while Andrew Inglis Clark (1848–1907) introduced the system to Tasmania with a modified counting method. "The specific modification introduced by Mr. A.I. Clark, Attorney-General for Tasmania, is the provision devised by him for eliminating the element of chance in the selection and distribution of quota-excesses or surplus transfer votes." The provision described as "Clark's own" was the Gregory method (later also adopted for the 1925 election of the Irish Senate), to transfer all votes to 'next order of preference' (the next usable marked preference), rather than a random sample. In 1896, after several failed attempts, Clark succeeded in having a system of proportional representation adopted by the Tasmanian Parliament. It was accepted only on a trial basis in the two main cities, Hobart (to elect 6 MPs) and Launceston (to elect 4 MPs). This first 'Hare-Clark system', as it was immediately known, was renewed annually until suspended in 1902. Clark, never in robust health, died at his home 'Rosebank' in Battery Point on 14 November 1907, just as the adoption of permanent proportional representation struggled through Parliament and over a year before it was used for the first time throughout Tasmania in the 1909 Tasmanian state election. for the House of Assembly. (Tasmania's Legislative Council is elected by Instant-runoff voting, the same system as is used to elect members of the Australian House of Representatives. The Hare-Clark System was implemented to elect the New South Wales Legislative Assembly in the 1920 elections. However Jack Lang changed the electoral system back to first past the post in single member electorates prior to the 1927 state election. The Hare-Clark System has been used to elect the Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly since 1992. Evolution Features of Hare-Clark have evolved over time. Until 1942, candidates were listed in alphabetic order rather than grouped together by party. so as to eliminate any influence of donkey votes. As well, district magnitude (the number of seats used in districts) has changed since 1896. ==Counting==

After a candidate reaches a quota and is elected, all of their ballot papers are redistributed to elect additional candidates based on the voters' next preferences indicated on each ballot paper. The redistributed votes have a reduced transfer value, which is determined by the relationship of the number of surplus votes received by the previously elected candidate compared to the total votes he or she holds. In a round that starts with no candidate holding un-transferred surplus votes, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and their preferences are transferred at full value to the next usable preference marked on each ballot. Ballot papers with non-transferable votes are set aside during this process. The process of conducting the vote count in Hare-Clark and Australian Senate style systems is largely similar, with only minor differences. Prior to the 2016 Australian federal election, group voting tickets were used for Senate elections. This allowed parties to determine the order in which preferences would be distributed to other candidates. This option for voters to have their preferences determined by group voting tickets is still in use in Victoria. In contrast, under Hare-Clark, preferences are always explicitly determined by individual voters, and there is no "above the line" voting option. Counting method with example 1. Initial count :Any invalid votes are excluded (e.g. no boxes marked) and then the first preferences from each ballot paper is tallied. They are allocated to marked candidate. Each candidate's total is announced. 2. Determining the quota :The total count of valid votes is used to calculate the quota of votes required for a candidate to be declared elected (the Droop quota). ::\mbox{quota to be elected} = \left({{\rm \mbox{total valid votes}} \over {\rm \mbox{number of vacancies}}+1}\right) + 1 3. Declaring candidates elected :Candidates who have more than the required quota of votes are declared elected. If there are still vacancies remaining, any surplus votes are distributed as outlined in 4 below. The count is complete if there are no remaining vacancies. 4. Candidates with surplus votes :The number of votes in excess of the quota is a surplus of votes. The number of surplus votes is used to determine the transfer value of distributed preferences from the candidate. ::4a. The transfer value is determined :::\mbox{transfer value} = \left({{\rm \mbox{surplus votes}} \over {\rm \mbox{last votes received}}}\right) ::4b. Distribution of preferences :::The preferences from the elected candidate is tallied using all of their ballot papers, and is distributed at the rate of the transfer value. ::::\mbox{value of distributed preferences} = \mbox{number of preferences} * \mbox{transfer value} ::4c. Counting the new totals :::The new candidate totals are counted (return to 3). :::Any candidate exceeding quota through these transfers is declared elect and those surplus votes transferred as well. However this time only the transfer that gave the candidate quota is used as basis for the transfer value, such as 199/300 where the surplus votes number 199 and the last transfer is 300. When all surpluses have been transferred and if there are still vacant seats remaining, the count proceeds to 5. The count is complete if there are no remaining vacancies. 5. Remaining candidates have not reached the quota :When there are still vacancies, but all the remaining candidates are equal to or less than the quota, the candidate with the lowest current vote is excluded. The preferences of the excluded candidate is then distributed (based on next usable marked preference), at full value, and new candidate totals are counted (return to 3). The count is complete if the number of candidates remaining is the same as remaining vacancies, at which time the remaining candidates are declared elected. ==See also==