There is a widely reported
Supreme Court of Canada case called
Starson v. Swayze that dealt with the right of a mentally ill person to refuse treatment, even if it is in their best interests to be treated (for example, with
anti-psychotic medication that would reduce
delusional thinking). The majority in
Starson v. Swayze ultimately decided that Starson did not lack capacity so he could make his own treatment decisions, even if his decision (to refuse anti-psychotic medication that would reduce delusional thinking) was not in his best interests. As a result, he could not be treated with psychiatric medication, even if that meant that his health deteriorated as a result. Critics of the decision in Starson argue that, because of mental deterioration, Starson did not have the capacity to make the decision to refuse treatment, and that his right to autonomy needs to be balanced with the right to be well. See also:
autonomy as opposed to
paternalism or
beneficence. Autonomy is a complex concept in
bioethics that has many variations. For example, there is the concept of
supported autonomy, that is, in order to support the autonomy of the person in the long term it may be necessary to compromise autonomy in the short term. == References ==