In a 44-page long article published in the
Journal of Ottoman Studies in 1986 (initially presented as a paper at a conference at
MESA), Lowry wrote a review against historian
Richard G. Hovannisian for his depiction of a junior American intelligence officer in his second volume on the history of the
First Republic of Armenia. Though it only occupied the space of a single footnote in a 603-page book, Lowry thought the alleged mischaracterizations by Hovannisian to be so egregious as to have compromised his scholarly integrity. Lowry took issue with the favorable reviews of the book by other historians such as
Firuz Kazemzadeh and
Roderic Davison and charged Hovannisian with distorting facts and displaying partiality in his work. In a point-by-point rebuttal published in the same year, Hovannisian expressed surprise at Lowry's outrage and decision to single out the depiction of one individual and use it as the sole basis to discredit his research. He went on to criticize Lowry for exaggerating the scope of minor errors, misinterpreting the sources, and failing to grasp nuances found in the primary source material, which in many cases agreed with what he had originally written. In 1990, Lowry claimed that ''
Ambassador Morgenthau's Story'' was a record of "crude half-truths and outright falsehoods". According to
Yair Auron, Lowry is recognized as a principal source discrediting Morgenthau, giving "impetus to the Turkish endeavor to deny the Armenian Genocide." Political scientist and
Armenian genocide denier Guenter Lewy also shares Lowry's main conclusions about Morgenthau's memoirs.
R.J. Rummel notes that Morgenthau's claims are consistent with many other sources of information, such as newsmen, other American diplomats, German diplomats and military personnel, Italian diplomats, other autobiographies, German and Turkish court testimony, Young Turk documents, reports of Turkish officials in the government, and refugees. Rummel concludes that he will "continue to give the Story credence until more neutral studies on it confirm Lowry's claim". According to
Thomas de Waal, the evidence in the ''Ambassador Morgenthau's Story'' was so damning that some
Armenian Genocide deniers, such as Lowry, have tried to disprove it, although much of the book's contents are verified by diplomatic cables and Morgenthau's access to the Ottoman leaders has been corroborated by other sources. == Criticism ==