History Because of its complex morphology, the taxonomical placement of
Hemimycale columella has changed often since its original description.
James Scott Bowerbank first described the species as
Desmacidon columella in 1874, taking particular note of its "exceedingly abundant"
gemmules.
Émile Topsent then moved the species to
Stylinos in 1891. He argued that the strongyles were sufficiently similar to warrant inclusion. However, in specimens from other localities from the ones he studied these similarities were not present. Thus,
Desmacidon columella required its own genus. The situation was complicated further in the 1890s, as the composition and identity of
Stylinos were brought into question. It was variously rejected entirely, synonymized with
Stylotella, or retained as it was. At this point, the species was called
Stylinos columella or
Stylotella columella, but in 1932 the genus
Prianos was resurrected by
Max Walker de Laubenfels to house the newly segregated
Prianos columella. This new name was not valid either, as the species had little in common with sponges previously placed in
Prianos. Finally, in 1934, Maurice Burton proposed the novel name
Hemimycale as the generic for Bowerbank's originally published
Desmacidon columella, creating the new combination
Hemimycale columella. The new construction referenced the similarities in larvae between the species and members of
Mycale, as well as the clear differences between
H. columella and all related sponges. However, even twenty years after the introduction of the new name, acceptance was not universal, with biologists in the 1950s still referring to the species as belonging to its previous genera. == Ecology ==