Hemoglobin A2 has a crucial role in screening and diagnosis of the beta-thalassemia trait. Various laboratory methods exist, each providing different outcomes of accuracy. The different quantification methods of HbA2 relies on how effective it can be separated from other hemoglobin variants. Various laboratory methods are employed, such as cation exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), microcolumn chromatography, and cellulose acetate electrophoresis with elution. At first, cellulose acetate electrophoresis was utilized to measure HbA2, but this process proved to be too time-consuming and labor-intensive, making it impractical for large examinations or samples. Similar efficiency issues were encountered with other methods like IEF and scanning densitometry. These two methods separate proteins based on their isoelectric point. Chromatography, another commonly used method, demonstrated reliability in diagnosing individuals with the beta carrier gene. However, this method was also time-consuming and inefficient when dealing with large sample numbers. Out of the various methods, the one that accurately measures HbA2 is HPLC. It is a reliable technique because it's able to accurately determine HbA2, HbF, and Hb variants. The various different Hb variants include: HbS, HbE, Hb Lepore, HbC,
HbD and HbO-Arab. There are several different factors that can contribute to the quantification of HbA2 to be inaccurately measured. These factors include column defects, batch variations, sample concentrations, dilution, calibration discrepancies, and the overall conditions of the samples. == References ==