Greek From 501 BC, the
Athenians annually elected ten individuals to the rank of
strategos, one for each of the ten "tribes" that had been created with the founding of the
democracy.
Strategos means "army leader" and is usually translated as "
general". Originally these generals worked together with the old
polemarchos ("warlord") but over time the latter figure was absorbed into the generalship: each of the ten generals would rotate as
polemarch for one day, and during this day his vote would serve as tie-breaker if necessary. As an elected official a Strategos is by definition not a military rank. Strategos is a Political Rank in a Hierarchical Position above the military, politically similar in nature to a modern-day Sheriff or Police Commissioner. This is completely different from a modern day Commissioned Military General who never stands for election at any point in their careers. Historically it is unclear whether there was any badge of office granted to a Strategos though given current customs one should suspect that there was such a badge of office. The confusion regarding the "Ranking" of Strategos surely stems from the modern custom of granting Police Commissioners and Sheriff's, both Political Ranks, a badge-of-office that happens to be in the shape of what is commonly understood to be a very high rank within the traditional military hierarchy. This "rank-shaped" badge-of-office a formal representation of Public Civilian (political) authority over military matters. The ten generals were equal to one another; there was no hierarchy among them. However, a basic form of democracy was in effect: for example, at the
Battle of Marathon in 490 BC, the generals determined the battle plan by majority vote. Particular assignments might have been given to individual generals; inevitably there was a regular division of responsibilities. The rank that was subordinate to a top general was a
taxiarchos or
taxiarhos, something akin to the modern
brigadier. In
Sparta, however, the title was "
polemarchos". Below this was the
syntagmatarchis, which can be translated as "leader of a
regiment" (
syntagma) and was therefore like a modern
colonel. Below him was the
tagmatarches, a commanding officer of a
tagma (near to the modern
battalion). The rank was roughly equivalent to the
legatus of a
Roman legion. Next was the
lokhagos, an officer who led an infantry unit called a
lokhos that consisted of roughly a hundred men, much the same as in a modern
company led by a
captain. A Greek cavalry (
hippikon) regiment was called a
hipparchia and was commanded by an
epihipparch. The unit was split into two and led by two
hipparchos or
hipparch, but Spartan cavalry was led by a
hipparmostes. A
hippotoxotès was a mounted archer. A Greek cavalry company was led by a
tetrarchès or
tetrarch. The rank and file of the military in most of the Greek city states was composed of ordinary citizens. Heavily armed foot soldiers were called
hoplitès or
hoplites and a
hoplomachos was a drill or weapons instructor. Once
Athens became a
naval power, the top generals of the land armies had authority over the naval fleets as well. Under them, each
warship was commanded by a
trièrarchos or
trierarch, a word which originally meant "
trireme officer" but persisted when other types of vessels came into use. Moreover, as in modern navies, the different tasks associated with running a ship were delegated to different subordinates. Specifically, the
kybernètès was the helmsman, the
keleustēs managed the rowing speed, and the
trièraulès was the flute player who maintained the strike rate for the oarsmen. Following further specialization, the naval
strategos was replaced by a
nauarchos, a sea officer equating to an
admiral. With the rise of
Macedonia under
Philip II of Macedon and
Alexander the Great, the Greek military became professional, tactics became more sophisticated and additional levels of ranking developed. Foot soldiers were organized into heavy infantry
phalanxes called
phalangites. These were among the first troops ever to be drilled, and they fought packed in a close rectangular formation, typically eight men deep, with a leader at the head of each column (or file) and a secondary leader in the middle so that the back rows could move off to the sides if more frontage was needed. A
tetrarchia was a unit of four files and a
tetrarchès or
tetrarch was a commander of four files; a
dilochia was a double file and a
dilochitès was a double-file leader; a lochos was a single file and a
lochagos was a file leader; a
dimoiria was a half file and a
dimoirites was a half-file leader. Another name for the half file was a
hèmilochion with a
hèmilochitès being a half-file leader. Different types of units, however, were divided differently and therefore their leaders had different titles. For example, under a numbering system by tens, a
dekas or
dekania was a unit of ten led by a
dekarchos, a
hekatontarchia was a unit of one hundred led by a
hekatontarchos and a
khiliostys or
khiliarchia was a unit of a thousand led by a
khiliarchos. The cavalry, for which Alexander became most famous (in a military sense), grew more varied. There were heavy cavalry and wing cavalry (
ilè) units, the latter commanded by an
ilarchos.
Roman The use of formalized ranks came into widespread use with the
Roman legions after the reforms by
Marius. Comparisons to modern ranks, however, can only be loose because the Roman army's command structure was very different from the organizational structure of its modern counterparts, which arose from the early modern, Thirty Years' War mercenary companies, rather than from the writings of fourth-century Roman writer
Vegetius and
Caesar's commentaries on his conquest of
Gaul and the civil war. Military command properly so-called was a political office in Rome. A commander needed to be equipped with
imperium, a politico-religious concept. The
king who possessed it (the
rex sacrorum) was strictly forbidden to have it to avoid a return to the monarchy. In the republic, commanding was confined to
consuls or (seldom) to
praetors, or in cases of necessity a
dictator.
Proconsuls, after the establishment of the office, were used. In imperial times, each legion was commanded by the emperor, who was technically either consul or proconsul. The commander could appoint a deputy, a so-called
legate (
legatus). The association of "
legatus" with "legion" is
folk etymology, as the meaning of
legatus is "proxy" or "envoy". Legates were typically drawn from the
Roman Senate for three-year terms. The political nature of high military command was even reflected here, in that legions were always subordinate to the
governor, and only the second and further legions stationed in a province had their own
legatus legionis. The real commanders and the legates together were, in modern terms, the
general officers. Immediately beneath the commander (or his legate) were six
military tribunes (
tribuni militum), five of whom were young men of
equestrian rank and one of whom was a nobleman who was headed for the senate. The latter is called
laticlavian tribune (
tribunus laticlavius) and was second in command. If in modern
divisions the deputy commander is a
brigadier general, the
laticlavian tribune can perhaps be translated with this rank, though he commanded no formation of his own. The other tribunes are called
tribuni angusticlavii and are equivalent to staff officers in both senses of the term: of ranks
major,
lieutenant colonel,
colonel, and with administrative duties. They did not command a formation of their own. The term
military tribune is even sometimes translated into English as "colonel"—most notably by the late classicist
Robert Graves in his
Claudius novels and his translation of
Suetonius'
Twelve Caesars—to avoid confusion with the political "
tribunes of the people"; in addition, they must not either be confused with the "military tribunes with consular authority", who in early republican times could replace the consuls. The third highest officer of a legion, above the
angusticlavian tribunes, was the
praefectus castrorum. He, too, would have a colonel's rank in modern armies, yet he differed much from the tribunes in that his office was not part of the rather administrative
cursus, but normally filled by former centurions. (Modern armies have a
similar distinction on a lower scale—i.e., between commissioned and non-commissioned officers.) The fighting men in the legion were formed into "ranks", rows of men who fought as a unit. Under Marius's new system, legions were divided into ten
cohorts (
cohortes) (roughly equivalent to
battalions and immediately subject to the legion), each consisting of three
manipula, each of them of two centuries (a rather small
company in modern terms), each consisting of between 60 and 160 men. Each century was led by a
centurion (
centurio, traditionally translated as
captain), who was assisted by a number of junior officers, such as an
optio. Centuries were further broken into ten
contubernia of eight soldiers each. The
manipula were commanded by one of their two centurions, the cohorts by one of their three ''manipulum's
centurions; the most senior cohort-commanding centurions was called primus pilus
. The ranks of centurions in the individual cohorts were, in descending order, pilus prior
, pilus posterior
, princeps prior
, princeps posterior
, hastatus prior
, and hastatus posterior
. Individual soldiers were referred to as soldiers (milites
) or legionaries (legionarii'').
Mongol See
Mongol military tactics and organization.
Turk There were no ranks in the modern sense of a hierarchy of titles, although the army was organized into a hierarchical command. The organization of the army was based on the decimal system, employed by
Modun Chanyu. The army was built upon a squad of ten (
aravt) led by an appointed chief. Ten of these would then compose a company of a hundred (
zuut), also led by an appointed chief. The next unit was a regiment of a thousand (
myangat) led by an appointed
noyan. The largest organic unit was a ten thousand man unit (
tumen) also led by an appointed
noyan.
Persian The army of ancient
Persia consisted of manageable military groupings under the individual commands. Starting at the bottom, a unit of 10 was called a
dathabam and was led by a
dathapatis. A unit of 100 men was a
satabam led by a
satapatis. A unit of 1,000 was a
hazarabam and was commanded by a
hazarapatis. A unit of 10,000 was a
baivarabam and was commanded by a
baivarapatis. The Greeks called such masses of troops a
myrias or
myriad. Among mounted troops, an
asabam was a
cavalry unit led by an
asapatis. Historians have discovered the existence of the following ranks in
Parthian and
Sassanian armies: • Commander-in-chief:
Eran spahbod (to be replaced with four
spahbods, one for each frontier of the empire during the reign of
Khosrau I) • Commander of the
cavalry:
Aspwargan salar (Parthian) or
aswaran salar (Sassanian) • Commander of the archers:
Tirbodh • Commander of the
infantry:
paygan salar •
Castellan:
Argbadh or
argbod • Commander of a frontier march:
Marzpawn (Parthian) or
marzban (Sassanian) •
Marzban of
Central Asian marches was called
kanarang == Post-classical ==