Natural factors Scientific studies on human sex ratio are based on extensive birth and death records in Africa, the Americas, Asia, Australia, and Europe. A few of these studies extend to over 100 years of yearly human sex ratio data for some countries. These studies suggest that the human sex ratio, both at birth and as a population matures, can vary significantly according to a large number of factors, such as paternal age, maternal age,
multiple births,
birth order, gestation weeks, race, parent's health history, and parent's psychological stress. The trends in human sex ratio are not consistent across countries at a given time, or over time for a given country. In economically developed countries, as well as developing countries, these scientific studies have found that the human sex ratio at birth has historically varied between 0.94 and 1.15 for natural reasons. While considering the race, human sex ratio at birth is about 1.03 for
Blacks and 1.06 for
Whites. In a scientific paper published in 2008, the author states that conventional assumptions have been: A dataset of 139,704 embryos derived from
assisted reproductive technology showed a male sex ratio of 50.2%.
Length of gestation A 2009 study reported the sex ratio derived from data in United States birth records over a 25-year period (1981–2006). This paper reports that the sex ratio at birth for the white ethnic group in the United States was 1.04 when the gestational age was 33–36 weeks, but 1.15 for gestational ages of less than 28 weeks, 28–32 weeks, and 37 or more weeks. This study also found that the sex ratios at birth in the United States, between 1981 and 2006, were lower in both black and Hispanic ethnic groups when compared with non-Hispanic white ethnic group. A 2010 study found that sex ratio does not seem to change significantly with either maternal or paternal age. Neither
gravidity nor
parity seem to affect the male-to-female ratio. These conclusions have been disputed, due to suggestions that the results are based on some demographic variables and a small data set, a broader study of variables and larger population set suggests human sex ratio shows substantial variation for various reasons and different trend effects of length of gestation than those reported.
Environmental factors Effects of climate change High temperature raises proportion of male births, but the reasons for this are disputed. A 2009 study on 138 years of human birth sex ratio data, from 1865 to 2003, found an increased excess of male births during periods of exogenous stress (World War II) and during warm years. In the warmest period over the 138 years, the birth sex ratio peaked at about 1.08 in Northern Europe.
Effects of gestation environment Causes of stress during gestation, such as maternal malnutrition, generally appear to increase fetal deaths, particularly among males, resulting in a lower sex ratio at birth. A higher incidence of
Hepatitis B virus in a population is believed to increase the sex ratio, while some unexplained environmental health hazards are thought to have the opposite effect. The effects of gestational environment on human sex ratio are complicated and unclear, with numerous conflicting reports. For example, a 2008 study found no effect on birth sex ratio from hepatitis B presence in either mothers or fathers in Chinese populations.
Effects of chemical pollution (left) and one of the
nonyl-phenols (right), an endocrine disruptor A 2007 survey by the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program noted abnormally low sex ratios in Russian Arctic villages and
Inuit villages in
Greenland and Canada, and attributed this imbalance to high levels of
endocrine disruptors in the blood of inhabitants, including
PCBs and
DDT. These chemicals are believed to have accumulated in the tissues of fish and animals that make up the bulk of these populations' diets. Some studies have found that certain kinds of environmental
pollution, specifically
dioxins, are associated with a lower sex ratio. Other scientific studies suggest that environmental effects on human sex ratio at birth are either limited or not properly understood. A 1999 study from Finland's National Public Health Institute reports the effect of environmental chemicals and changes in sex ratio over 250 years in Finland. It evaluated whether Finnish long-term data are compatible with the hypothesis that the decrease in the ratio of male to female births in industrial countries is caused by environmental factors. They analyzed the sex ratio of births from the files of Statistics Finland and all live births in Finland from 1751 to 1997. They found an increase in the proportion of males from 1751 to 1920; this was followed by a decrease and interrupted by peaks in births of males during and after World War I and World War II. None of the natural factors such as paternal age, maternal age, age difference of parents or birth order could explain the time trends. They found that the peak sex ratio precedes the period of industrialization and the introduction of pesticides or hormonal drugs, rendering a causal association between environmental chemicals and human sex ratio at birth unlikely. Moreover, these scientists claim that the trends they found in Finland are similar to those observed in other countries with higher levels of pollution and much greater pesticide use. It is important to exclude alternative explanations, including social ones, when examining large human populations whose composition by ethnicity and race may be changing. Other factors that could possibly affect the sex ratio include: • Social status of the mother, known to be a factor in influencing the sex ratio of certain animals such as swine, but apparently not in humans. • Whether the mother has a partner may have a small effect on sex ratio, with a 2004 study of 84,500 births finding 51.5% male births among women living with a partner, and 49.9% in women who were not. •
Latitude, with countries near the equator producing more females than near the poles.
Social factors Population composition A 2005 study of California, where declining sex ratios had been observed, observed "In the raw data, the male birth proportion is indeed declining. However, during this period, there were also shifts in demographics that influence the sex ratio. Controlling for birth order, parents' age, and race/ethnicity, different trends emerged. White births (which account for over 80%) continued to show a statistically significant decline, while other racial groups showed non-statistically significant declines (Japanese-American, Native American, other), with little or no change (Black American), or an increase (Chinese-American). Finally, when the white births were divided into Hispanic and non-Hispanic (possible since 1982), it was found that both white subgroups suggest an increase in male births." They concluded "that the decline in male births in California is largely attributable to changes in demographics."
Effects of war Increased sex ratio during and after a war is called the
returning soldier effect. There is still no clear explanation of its mechanics.
Early marriage and parents' age A 1985 study of 1.67 million births in 33 states in the United States and a 1999 study of 820,000 births in Denmark found that maternal age has no statistically significant role on the human birth sex ratio. However, they report a significant effect of paternal age. Significantly more male babies were born per 1000 female babies to younger fathers than to older fathers. These studies suggest that social factors such as
early marriage and males siring their children at a young age may play a role in raising birth sex ratios in certain societies.
Partnership status A 2004 study of 86,436 human births from a US population-based survey showed that 51.4% boys were born among married parents living together, 52.2% among unmarried parents living together and only 49.9% boys among parents living apart.
Economic factors A 2003 study examined the hypothesis that population stress induced by a declining economy reduces the human sex ratio. It compared the sex ratio in East and West Germany for the years 1946 to 1999, with genetically similar populations. The population stressors theory predicts that the East German sex ratio should have been lower than expected in 1991, when East Germany's economy collapsed, than in previous years. The hypothesis further suggests that, over time, East German birth sex ratios should generally be lower than the observed sex ratios found in West Germany for the same years. According to the study, the birth sex ratio data from East Germany and West Germany over 45 years support the hypothesis. The sex ratio in East Germany was also at its lowest in 1991. According to the study, assuming women in East Germany did not opt to abort male fetuses more than female fetuses, the best hypothesis is that a collapsing economy lowers the human birth sex ratio, while a booming economy raises the birth sex ratio. The publication notes that these trends may be related to the observed trend of an elevated occurrence of very
low birth-weight babies from maternal stress, during certain macroeconomic circumstances.
Sex-selective abortion and infanticide Sex-selective abortion and
infanticide are thought to significantly skew the naturally occurring ratio in some populations, such as China, where the introduction of ultrasound scans in the late 1980s has led to a birth sex ratio (males to females) of 1.181 (2010 official census data for China). The 2011 India census reports India's sex ratio in the 0–6 age bracket at 1.088. The 2011 birth sex ratios for China and India are significantly above the mean ratio recorded in the United States from 1940 through 2002 (1.051); however, their birth sex ratios are within the 0.98–1.14 range observed in the United States for major ethnic groups over the same time period.
Disparate gendered access to resources There is evidence that some of the variation in global sex ratios is due to disparate access to resources. As MacPherson (2007) notes, there can be significant differences in gender violence and access to food, healthcare, immunizations between male and female children. This leads to high infant and childhood mortality among girls, which causes changes in sex ratio. Disparate, gendered access to resources appears to be strongly linked to socioeconomic status. Specifically, poorer families are sometimes forced to ration food, with daughters typically receiving less priority than sons. However, Klasen's 2001 study revealed that this practice is less common in the poorest families, but rises dramatically in the slightly less poor families. Additionally, high female education rates are correlated with lower sex ratios (World Bank 2011). Lopez and Ruzikah (1983) found that, when given the same resources, women tend to outlive men at all stages of life after infancy. However, globally, resources are not always allocated equitably. Thus, some scholars argue that disparities in access to resources such as healthcare, education, and nutrition play at least a small role in the high sex ratios seen in some parts of the world. Economic disadvantage alone may not always lead to increased sex ratio, claimed Sen in 1990. For example, in sub-Saharan Africa, one of the most economically disadvantaged regions of the world, there is an excess of women. So, if economic disadvantage is uncorrelated with sex ratio in Africa, some other factor(s) may be at play. Thus economic disadvantage remains a possible unresolved hypothesis for Africa as well. ==Consequences of different sex ratios==