Huni's cartouche name Huni's identity is difficult to establish, since his name is passed down mostly as
cartouche name and in different variations. The earliest mention of his cartouche name may possibly be on the granite cone from Elephantine, which might be contemporary. Otherwise, the earliest appearances of Huni's cartouche can be found on the Palermo Stone P1, dating to the 5th dynasty, and on the
Prisse Papyrus of the
13th dynasty. Huni's cartouche can also be found in the
Saqqara kinglist and the
Turin Canon, both dating back to the
19th dynasty. The
Abydos kinglist, which also dates to the 19th dynasty, mysteriously omits Huni's name and gives instead a
Neferkara who is unknown to Egyptologists. One suggestion for this omission is that
Neferkara was the nomen for
Huni. The reading and translation of Huni's cartouche name is also disputed. In general, two basic versions of his name exist: an old version, which is closest to the (lost) original, and a younger version, which seems to be based on ramesside interpretations and misreadings. instead reads
Ny Swteh or
Nyswteh ("He who belongs to the smiters") and is convinced that Huni's name was
theophoric. In particular, he compares Huni's name construction with those of the kings
Nynetjer ("He who belongs to the deified
Horus") and
Nyuserre ("He who belongs to those with the power of
Ra"). An alternative reading proposed for
Nyswteh is "He who belongs to
Seth", given that "Swteh" could not be referring to smiters but instead could be another form of "Sutekh", another name for Seth.
Rainer Stadelmann and
Wolfgang Helck strongly refute Gödicke's reading, pointing out that no single Egyptian document mentions a deity, person, place or even a single colloquial term named "Swteh", and that it's impossible to know if "Swteh" is another name of Seth. Thus there is no grammatical source that could have been used to make a royal name "Nyswteh". Helck instead suggests a reading as
Hwj-nj-niswt and translates it as "The utterance belongs to the king". However, its dating and authenticity have been put into question several times, and today the stela is believed to be either fake, or dedicated to king
Thutmose III (18th dynasty) while imitating the artistic style of Dynasty III.
Peter Kaplony promotes an ominous name found in the burial shaft of an unfinished pyramid at
Zawyet el'Aryan. The monument is connected with a possible pharaoh named
Bikheris. The name in question reads
Neb-hedjetnwb ("lord of the golden crown") and is thought by Kaplony to be Huni's possible Horus name. However, Egyptologists such as
Aidan Dodson contradict this theory and argue that
Neb-hedjetnwb, with its gold hieroglyph, should rather be the Golden Horus name of Bikheris. Other Egyptologists, such as
Toby Wilkinson and Rainer Stadelmann, identify Huni with the contemporarily well-attested king
Horus-Khaba ("the soul of Horus appears"). Their identification is based on the circumstance that both kings' Horus names appear on incised stone vessels without any further guiding notes. It was a fashion that began with the death of king
Khasekhemwy (end of the 2nd dynasty) and ended with king
Sneferu (beginning of the
4th dynasty). Thus, it was a very typical practice of the 3rd dynasty. Additionally, Stadelmann points to the
Layer Pyramid at Zawyet el'Aryan. This monument was possibly built by Khaba, since a nearby mastaba contained several stone vessels with his Horus name. Since the Turin Canon credits a reign of 24 years to Huni, Stadelmann argues that this time span would perfectly fit to finish the Layer Pyramid. Furthermore, Stadelmann points to the large amount of discovered mud seal impressions, stone bowls and widespread find spots throughout Egypt. In his opinion, the archaeological context also speaks for a longer-lasting reign. Thus, he identifies Khaba with Huni. == Family ==