Huntingdon is criticised by
animal rights and
animal welfare groups for using animals in research, for instances of
animal abuse and for the wide range of substances it tests on animals, particularly non-medical products. It is claimed by SHAC that 500 animals died every day at HLS (182,500 a year), a figure at odds with HLS' published numbers. Huntingdon's labs were infiltrated by
undercover animal rights
activists in 1997 in the UK and in 1998 in the US. In 1997, film secretly recorded inside HLS in the UK by
BUAV and subsequently broadcast on
Channel 4 television as "It's a Dog's Life", showed serious breaches of animal-protection laws, including a
beagle puppy being held up by the scruff of the neck and repeatedly punched in the face, and animals being taunted. The laboratory technicians responsible were suspended from HLS the day after the broadcast. All three were later dismissed. Two of the men seen hitting and shaking dogs were found guilty under the
Protection of Animals Act 1911 of "cruelly terrifying dogs." It was the first time laboratory technicians had been prosecuted for animal cruelty in the UK. HLS admitted that the technicians' behaviour was deplorable and a new management team was introduced the following year which, according to
The Daily Telegraph, "introduced greater openness and new training methods." A 2001 article from
The Resurgence Trust stated that HLS obtained a "gagging order" in the US that prevents PETA from publicising or talking about any of the information that they discovered. The order also prevented PETA from communicating with the American Department of Agriculture, which had been going to investigate the evidence.
Protests and intimidation The
Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC) campaign is based in the UK and US, and has aimed to close the company down since 1999. According to its website, the campaign's methods are restricted to non-violent
direct action, as well as
lobbying and demonstrations. It targets not only HLS itself, but any company, institution, or person allegedly doing business with the laboratory, whether as clients, suppliers, or even disposal and cleaning services, and the employees of those companies. Despite its stated non-violent position, SHAC members have been convicted of crimes of violence against HLS employees. On 25 October 2010 five SHAC members received prison sentences for threatening HLS staff. SHAC has also been accused of encouraging
arson and violent assault. An HLS director was assaulted in front of his child. HLS managing director
Brian Cass was sent a mousetrap primed with razor blades, Another businessman with links to HLS was attacked and knocked unconscious adjacent to a barn his assailants had set alight. In 2003,
Daniel Andreas San Diego was accused by the American FBI of "ecoterrorism" in support of SHAC in the San Francisco Area; however, there is some question whether his "terrorist plot" was an entrapment operation by the American FBI. In 2008 seven of SHAC's senior members were described by prosecutors as "some of the key figures in the Animal Liberation Front" and found guilty of conspiracy to blackmail HLS.
Effect of campaign The campaign against HLS led to its share price crashing, the
Royal Bank of Scotland closing its bank account, and the British government arranging for the
Bank of England to give them an account.
Government response From 2006,
The Daily Telegraph reports, the British Government took the decision to tackle "the problem of animal rights extremism." In total, 32 people linked to the group were arrested, and seven leading members of SHAC, including
Greg Avery, were found guilty of blackmail. Police estimated in 2007 that, as a consequence of the operation, "up to three quarters of the most violent activists" were jailed.
Der Spiegel writes that the number of attacks on HLS and their business declined drastically but "the movement is by no means dead." ==References==