described the disorder in his first paper, "
On Chorea", at the age of 22. In centuries past, various kinds of chorea were at times called by names such as ''
Saint Vitus' dance'', with little or no understanding of their cause or type in each case. The first definite mention of HD was in a letter by
Charles Oscar Waters (1816–1892), published in the first edition of
Robley Dunglison's
Practice of Medicine in 1842. Waters described "a form of chorea, vulgarly called magrums", including accurate descriptions of the chorea, its progression, and the strong heredity of the disease. In 1846
Charles Rollin Gorman (1817–1879) observed how higher prevalence seemed to occur in localized regions. (1830–1906) also produced an early description in 1860. The first thorough description of the disease was by
George Huntington in 1872. Examining the combined medical history of several generations of a family exhibiting similar symptoms, he realized their conditions must be linked; he presented his detailed and accurate definition of the disease as his first paper. Huntington described the exact pattern of inheritance of autosomal dominant disease years before the rediscovery by scientists of
Mendelian inheritance. Sir
William Osler was interested in the disorder and chorea in general, and was impressed with Huntington's paper, stating, "In the history of medicine, there are few instances in which a disease has been more accurately, more graphically or more briefly described." Osler's continued interest in HD, combined with his influence in the field of medicine, helped to rapidly spread awareness and knowledge of the disorder throughout the medical community. Jelliffe's research roused the interest of his college friend,
Charles Davenport, who commissioned Elizabeth Muncey to produce the first field study on the
East Coast of the United States of families with HD and to construct their pedigrees. Davenport used this information to document the variable age of onset and range of symptoms of HD; he claimed that most cases of HD in the US could be traced back to a handful of individuals. The claim that the earliest progenitors had been established and
eugenic bias of Muncey's, Davenport's, and Vessie's work contributed to misunderstandings and prejudice about HD. This idea has not been proven through scientific research. Researchers have found contrary evidence; for instance, the community of the family studied by George Huntington openly accommodated those who exhibited symptoms of HD. Sabin's three brothers also had this disease. The foundation was involved in the recruitment of more than 100 scientists in the US-Venezuela Huntington's Disease Collaborative Project, which over a 10-year period from 1979, worked to locate the genetic cause. The study had focused on the populations of two isolated
Venezuelan villages, Barranquitas and Lagunetas, where there was an unusually high prevalence of HD, and involved over 18,000 people, mostly from a single extended family, and resulted in making HD the first
autosomal disease
locus found using
genetic linkage analysis. Among other innovations, the project developed
DNA-marking methods which were an important step in making the
Human Genome Project possible. In the same time, key discoveries concerning the mechanisms of the disorder were being made, including the findings by
Anita Harding's research group on the effects of the gene's length. Modeling the disease in various types of animals, such as the
transgenic mouse developed in 1996, enabled larger-scale experiments. As these animals have faster
metabolisms and much shorter lifespans than humans results from experiments are received sooner, speeding research. The 1997 discovery that mHTT fragments
misfold led to the discovery of the nuclear inclusions they cause. These advances have led to increasingly extensive research into the proteins involved with the disease, potential drug treatments, care methods, and the gene itself. Doctors are working toward rekindling these networks because the people who have contributed to the science of HD by participating in these studies deserve adequate follow-up care; societies elsewhere in the world who benefit from the scientific advances thus achieved owe at least that much to those who participated in the research. ==Society and culture==