Original Selectric The Selectric typewriter was introduced on 31 July 1961. Its
industrial design is credited to influential American designer
Eliot Noyes. Noyes had worked on a number of design projects for
IBM; prior to his work on the Selectric, he had been commissioned in 1956 by
Thomas J. Watson Jr. to create IBM's first
house style: these influential efforts, in which Noyes collaborated with
Paul Rand,
Marcel Breuer, and
Charles Eames, have been referred to as the first "house style" program in American business.
Selectric Composer In 1966, IBM released the
Selectric Composer for use in
phototypesetting applications. This highly modified (and much more expensive) Selectric produced camera-ready
justified copy using
proportional fonts in a variety of font styles ranging from eight
points to fourteen points. Material prepared on a properly-adjusted machine by a skillful operator and printed onto baryta (
barium sulfate-coated) paper "would take an expert to tell... [that it] was not the product of a
Linotype or
Monotype machine". Characters were proportionally spaced, three to nine units wide, the size of a unit being selectable as either 1/72", 1/84" or 1/96" to allow for the three sizes of type. (A
monospaced "Typewriter Font", in which all characters occupied four units, was available for brief imitations of conventional typed text.) Tab stops could be positioned only at intervals of one-sixth of an inch, or one
pica. To support backspacing over previously typed characters, the spacing code for the last forty or so characters typed was mechanically stored by small sliding plates in a carrier wheel. Like the
Varityper with which it competed, the original machine required that material be typed twice if the output was to be
justified. The first time was to measure the length of the line and count the spaces, recording measurements read from a special dial on the right margin. The second time it was typed, the operator set the measurements into the dial to set justification for each line. The process was tedious and slow, but did provide a way to get camera-ready, proportionally spaced, justified copy from a desk-sized, affordable machine. The elements for the Selectric Composer would physically fit on a Selectric and vice versa, but were not interchangeable because the characters were arranged and positioned differently around the element. Selectric Composer elements can be distinguished by their colored index arrow (the color indicated which of the three type sizes) and a series of letters and numbers identifying the font, size, and variation, for example "UN-11-B" for Univers 11-point bold (
Adrian Frutiger had adapted his
Univers font specifically for the Selectric Composer). In addition to Univers, a
Century,
Times Roman–like font, and later an "Aldine" font (
Bembo) were available, as was a Symbols font. However, the Composer, with its relatively small market, never had anything like the variety of typefaces available as there were for the Selectric (see below). Each font required separate elements for italic and bold versions, and a separate set of roman/italic/bold balls was required for each font size. Not all typefaces were available in bold and italic in every size for every font. Bold italic, condensed, and light fonts were not available. The need to change elements frequently, sometimes multiple times in the same sentence, slowed work down and was a source of owner dissatisfaction. (In typical use, Selectric elements were changed infrequently.) The small plastic balls were themselves somewhat fragile and not designed to withstand frequent handling. Nevertheless, the Composer allowed much more flexible use of different typefonts, allowing small businesses and organizations to approach the capabilities of professional typesetters, at a reduced cost. Italic and bold were available for some but not all font "families". Up to three point sizes existed for each style and variety. In contrast with the Selectric, a change of type style usually required purchase of a family of type balls, rather than just a single one. Just as in the days of metal type, no single printing shop had every typeface, it was also rare for a user to possess a complete set, but no user needed to; a publication that could use the somewhat bookish, academic Aldine Roman would probably not have much use for the Classified News or Copperplate Gothic (used most often for formal invitations and business cards). The following font families were available for the Composer: • Aldine Roman (similar to
Bembo) •
Baskerville •
Bodoni • Century (similar to
Century Schoolbook) • Classified News (similar to
News Gothic) •
Copperplate Gothic • Journal Roman (similar to
Janson) • Orator (a
sans-serif for documents to be read aloud, enlarging letters to the maximum possible on the font element) • Press Roman (similar to
Times Roman); includes Press Roman Symbol (Greek, Mathematical, Technical) • Pyramid (a
slab-serif similar to Rockwell) • Theme (a
sans-serif with stroke contrast, similar to
Optima) •
Univers • Ruling Font In contrast to the Selectric typewriter, only IBM made elements for the standard typefaces usually used with the Composer. GP, which made elements for the Selectric typewriter, did make one Composer element in an Old English typeface. installation in use In 1967, a "
Magnetic Tape Selectric Composer" appeared, and in 1978, a "Magnetic Card Selectric Composer". The "Electronic Composer" (with approximately 5000 characters of internal memory, similar to the later Magnetic Card model but without external storage) was marketed from 1975. All these models used the same Selectric Composer output (printing) mechanism. However, the magnetic or internal storage allowed these improved models to avoid the need to type in justified text twice, or to manually set the mechanism for justification of each line. Furthermore, tapes or cards originally recorded on the much less-expensive and easier-to-operate Selectric typewriter versions, the
MT/ST or MC/ST, could be read by the "Composer" equivalents. This allowed much of the time-consuming manual transcription work and proofreading to be performed on less-expensive equipment, while a final high-quality output could be printed on the Composer. For a number of years after its introduction, the Selectric Composer was considered a highly desirable, powerful desk-sized
cold type setting system, affordable by small businesses and organizations. It was usually leased, including a
service contract for the skilled labor required to fix and adjust it. The Selectric Composer was accorded respect and affection among small publishers, unrivaled until the appearance of the
Apple Macintosh,
laser printer, and
desktop publishing software. Ultimately the system proved a transitional product, as it was displaced by cheaper and faster phototypesetting, and then in the 1980s by
word processors and general-purpose computers.
Electronic Selectric Composer The Electronic Selectric Composer was released in January 1975 by the office division of IBM; it was an automated, direct impression composition unit with a built-in memory of up to 8,000 characters and automatic justification with one keyboarding. With these features, it became a workhorse for producing camera-ready texts for low-cost books and other publications with modest quality demands. Other features included automatic printout of columns in one playout and reformatting ease with capability of justified, “rag” right, flush left or virtually any configuration specified. It also had over 125 interchangeable printing fonts (type heads) in sizes from 3 to 12 points.
Selectric III In 1980, IBM introduced the
Selectric III, followed by several other Selectric models, some of them word processors or typesetters instead of typewriters, but by then the rest of the industry had caught up, and IBM's new models did not dominate the market the way the first Selectric had. This was to be expected, as by the late 1970s the Selectric typewriter's dominance was under assault from both 35–45 character per second proportional-spacing electronic typewriters with inbuilt memory, like the 800 from
Xerox based on
Diablo's "
daisywheels" and OEMs of
Qume which had similar printwheel technology, and CRT-based systems from AES, Lexitron, Vydek, Wang and Xerox. In addition, IBM had already (c. 1977) brought to market the CRT-based
Office System/6 and
5520, both of which used the new 6640
inkjet printer capable of 96 characters per second with two paper trays and sophisticated envelope handling, and was about to introduce Qume-based printers for the existing System/6 range and the new
Displaywriter launched in June 1980 and described by IBM as "not your father's Selectric". Nevertheless, IBM had a large installed base of Selectric typewriters and to retain customer loyalty it made sense to introduce updated models. The Selectric III featured a 96-character element vs. the previous 88-character element. IBM's series of "Electronic Typewriters" used this same 96-character element. The 96-character elements can be identified by yellow printing on the top plastic surface and the legend "96", which always appears along with the font name and pitch. The 96- and 88-character elements are mechanically incompatible with each other (they will not fit on each other's machines) and 96-character elements were not available in as many fonts as the older 88-character types. Most Selectric IIIs and Electronic Typewriters had keys only for 92 printable characters; the 96-character keyboard was an optional feature. Fitting the additional keys onto the keyboard required shrinking the Return and Backspace keys. This was annoying to many typists, so it was not the default configuration. The keytops on SelectricIII and Electronic Typewriters were larger and more square than those on earlier Selectrics. Some versions of the Electronic Typewriter, the original Model 50, and the later Model 65 and 85, could use 96-character elements with proportionally-spaced typestyles in addition to 10-pitch and 12-pitch typestyles. This proportional spacing was based on a unit of 1/60 of an inch, since 10-pitch characters took six such units, and 12-pitch characters took five such units. (Many daisywheel typewriters, offering similar capabilities, also had daisywheel elements for 15-pitch typing, using four units per character.) The proportional typestyles offered for these typewriters had previously been offered, along with some others, on 88-character elements for a little-known variant of the MC/ST called the Mag Card Executive.
IBM Personal Typewriter Shortly after the introduction of the Selectric III, IBM introduced the
IBM Personal Typewriter, a hybrid model that used the widely available 88-character “golfball” type elements and correction tape of the Selectric II, but used the newer Selectric III's ribbon cartridges. Limited to a single fixed pitch (only 12 CPI, though either pica or elite type elements could be used), the typewriter was significantly less expensive than either the Selectric II or Selectric III and targeted the home and consumer markets.
Eavesdropping There is at least one known case of the Selectric exploited as a
covert listening device of the type known as a "
keyboard logger". In 1984, bugs were discovered in at least 16 Selectric typewriters in the
U.S. Embassy in Moscow and the
U.S. Consulate in Leningrad. The highly sophisticated devices were planted by the Soviets between 1976 and 1984, and were hidden inside a metal support bar. Information was intercepted by detecting the movements of metal bars inside the typewriter (the "latch interposers") by means of
magnetometers. The data were then compressed and transmitted in bursts. The bugs were installed in Selectric II and III models.{{cite report |first=Sharon A. |last=Maneki
Successor IBM introduced the
IBM Wheelwriter in 1984 as a successor to the Selectric. The Wheelwriter featured a replaceable
daisy wheel cartridge, had electronic memory, and offered many word processing features. == Keyboard layout ==