JPEG2000 and ICER have many important internal differences • JPEG 2000 uses floating point math, where ICER uses only integer math. Thus ICER will have good performance on integer only CPUs like the T414
Transputer, whereas JPEG 2000 will not perform as well as it is forced into
floating point emulation. • ICER reverts to a separate internal LOCO (Low Complexity Lossless Compression) compressor for lossless image compression. • JPEG 2000 implements a low complexity symmetrical wavelet lossless compressor, but ICER uses an integer only non-wavelet lossless compressor. • ICER and JPEG 2000 encode color spaces differently. • ICER in its current form does compress monochrome images better than colour images due to its origins as an internal NASA
Deep Space Network file format. • ICER is subject to less than 1% overshoot when byte and quality quotas are in effect. On the other hand, JPEG2000 codecs are typically designed never to overshoot their byte quotas. == When should one use ICER or ICER-3D ==