In 1994, the IDF recognized the need for a formal ethical framework and established a committee to develop what would become "The Spirit of the IDF." Major General
Yoram Yair, who was serving as the commander of the
Manpower Directorate within the General Staff at the time, led this committee. The team included Professor
Asa Kasher from
Tel Aviv University, a philosopher with expertise in
Professional Ethics. Upon completion and adoption of the code, a standing order was issued stating that after five years, a review committee would assess the code's integration into the IDF. However, the initial attempt at integration failed, partly because, as some critics pointed out, there was no strategic implementation plan. This committee consisted of several esteemed professors, Avi Sagi, Danny Statman, Avshalom Adam, Shaul Smilansky, Noam Zohar, and
Moshe Halbertal, who were known for their expertise in ethics and moral philosophy. High-ranking IDF officers, including Major General
Yishai Beer and Colonel Yaakov Castel, were also part of the committee. The General Staff approved the revisions, leading to a new iteration of "The Spirit of the IDF," which differed from the original document created by Major General Yoram Yair and Professor Kasher.
Implementation and integration Dr. Avshalom Adam developed the implementation strategy for the ethical code, and the Chief of General Staff later approved it. The process was first integrated within the IDF's Ground Forces, with the Artillery Corps serving as the pilot group. Traditionally, each new conscript was given a copy of "The Spirit of the IDF" as part of their service book, although this practice has ceased. However, the principles of the code are still disseminated during basic training through educational lectures.
Modifications In 2022, under the leadership of Chief of General Staff
Aviv Kochavi, an additional value, "Stateliness" was incorporated into "The Spirit of the IDF", reflecting the evolving nature of military ethics and the importance of aligning with contemporary values and strategic thinking. ==Criticism==