The similarity of the name
Hayasa to the endonym of the
Armenians, , and the Armenian name for Armenia, or , has prompted the suggestion that the Hayasa-Azzi confederation was involved in the Armenian ethnogenesis, or perhaps had been an Armenian-speaking state.
-assa/
-asa are, respectively, Hittite and
Hieroglyphic Luwian genitive suffixes. Therefore, Hayasa could have been a Hittite or Luwian name meaning "land of the Hay." While the language or languages spoken in Hayasa-Azzi are unknown, there does seem to have been a prevalent non-
Anatolian Indo-European linguistic element. This language seems to have had some similarities to
Ancient Greek and could have been an early Armenian dialect. Vartan Matiossian argues instead that this name is a form of
Classical Armenian , also meaning 'young man'. Both the Sanskrit and Armenian words ultimately derive from the same Proto-Indo-European root, . A few of the gods of Hayasa-Azzi recorded in treaties with the Hittites could be connected to Armenian or Greek traditions.
Unag-Astuas is likely connected, at least etymologically, to Classical Armenian (Modern Armenian: ), which means 'God' and continues to be used in Armenian today.
Baltaik could be a goddess connected to West Semitic
Ba‘alat (
Astarte), with a probable Armenian diminutive suffix (such as is present in the name of the Armenian goddess,
Astłik). Terittituniš might be connected to the
Triton of Greek mythology. The treasury and royal burials of the
Arsacid (Arshakuni) dynasty would be located in this region as well during the 1st millennium BCE. Ani-Kammahk, probably the Kummaha of Hittite sources, was the main cultic center of the goddess
Anahit and the location of the Armenian royal tombs during the
Classical era. According to the prominent linguist
Hrachia Acharian, the name of the city Kummaha could derive from , the Armenian word for 'skeleton'. However, there is almost no evidence of a close Armenian-Phrygian connection. The term
Hayastan bears resemblance to the ancient
Mesopotamian god Haya (
ha-ià) and another western deity called
Ebla Hayya, related to the god
Ea ( or in Sumerian, in Akkadian and Babylonian). Thus, the
Great Soviet Encyclopedia of 1962 posited that the
Armenians derive from a migration of Hayasa into
Shupria in the 12th century BCE. This is open to objection due to the possibility of a mere coincidental similarity between the two names.
Criticism of Armenian connection theory The mentioning of the name
Armenia can only be securely dated to the 6th century BCE with the
Orontid kings and very little is known specifically about the people of Hayasa-Azzi per se. Igor Diakonoff argues the pronunciation of Hayasa was probably closer to
Khayasa, with an aspirated
h. According to him, this nullifies the connection to Armenian
Hay (հայ). Additionally, he argues that
-asa cannot be an Anatolian language suffix as names with this suffix are absent in the Armenian Highlands. Diakonoff's criticisms have been refuted by Matiossian and others, who argue that, as Hayasa is a Hittite (or Hittite-ized) exonym applied to a foreign land, the
-asa suffix can still mean "land of." Additionally, Khayasa can be reconciled with
Hay as the Hittite
h and
kh phonemes are interchangeable, a feature present in certain Armenian dialects as well. == See also ==