Tournefort's central work has been praised for its simplicity of organization, and for its role as a foundational document for later botanists. One biographer of Tournefort noted that the work was highly influenced by the societal thinking of the time.
Eléments de botanique was a strictly utilitarian work: it was solely designed to facilitate plant identification in order that those plants may be put to use for their various purposes. As such, every name had to be clearly linked to one species only; there was as little ambiguity as possible. Many French, English, Italian, and German botanists continued to use Tournefort's system throughout the first half of the 18th century, much in the same way that later taxonomists would model their works off the system of
Carl Linnaeus. The book also reached outside of botanical circles. For example,
Charles De Geer (who would later become a prominent
entomologist) purchased three volumes of the 1719 edition of
Institutiones rei herbariae. De Geer used the book to identify plants in his own garden, and also made use of Tournefort's classification system in his publications. However, some 18th-century
naturalists, following the principles of
John Locke, argued against the
nominalism of Tournefort. Where Tournefort argued that the "essence of the plant" could be tied to specific and generic names, botanists like
Georges-Louis Leclerc and
Jean-Baptiste Lamarck did not believe an organized science should be burdened by arbitrary nominal distinctions. == Notes ==