The trial of Israel Dammon would be an insignificant footnote in 19th century Maine history were it not for the fact that two participating people who were not arrested nor testified at trial eventually became two of the principal founders of the Seventh-day Adventist Church—the traveling team of James White and his eventual wife, Ellen Harmon. Aside from James' mute presence and uncertain involvement with Dorinda Baker, Ellen was the featured personality of the event, lying on the floor for hours receiving visions and periodically sitting up to deliver her messages that often called for various people immediately to be baptized so as not "to go to hell." In 1860, she reflected on this trip with James in 1845, ostensibly to confront Millerite fanaticism throughout Maine. In this context, she discussed the events at Atkinson but gave a very different account compared what the trial report conveyed. The confusion and chaos of the event and her central ecstatic role in the reception of visions while lying on the floor and sharing the hell-fire messages with those present, all far from her supposed mission of confronting fanaticism, were conveniently ignored. Instead, she focused on how the power of God for about forty minutes prevented officials from arresting "Eld. D," who later kept his guard up all night with his "singing, and praying, and praising the Lord." Although she mentioned the trial, her account differed significantly from the newspaper report. Clearly, James' and her participation in the Atkinson event had become a major embarrassment to them and their colleagues in the nascent denomination. This matter emerged periodically throughout the rest of Ellen's life. In 1874,
Miles Grant, a spiritual descendant of William Miller, became a vocal critic of Ellen White. In a debate with
Dudley Canright, still a Seventh-day Adventist at the time, Grant claimed that he had correspondence from Israel Dammon asserting that he had rejected the validity of White's visions. Canright countered by stating that her visions had exposed his fanaticism. A recent scholar has pointed to the uncharacteristic absence of Ellen's participation in a supposedly Dammon-related fanatical meeting in 1845 in Canright's later attack on Seventh-day Adventism as evidence that her 1860 account of the meeting is more credible than the contemporary newspaper report. Canright repeatedly used every argument he could against Ellen White, so although this is an argument from silence, it does provide nuance to the discussions and evidence that early Adventists were familiar with the Dammon incident but did not consider it credible enough to refute any further in their continued apologetic literature. == See also ==