Propulsion The Viggen was powered by a single
Volvo RM8 turbofan. This was essentially a heavily modified
licence-built variant of the
Pratt & Whitney JT8D engine that powered commercial airliners of the 1960s, with an afterburner added for the Viggen. The airframe also incorporated a thrust reverser to use during landings and land manoeuvres, which, combined with the aircraft having flight capabilities approaching a limited STOL-like performance, enabled operations from 500 m airstrips with minimal support. The requirements from the Swedish Air Force dictated Mach 2 capability at high altitude and Mach 1 at low altitude. At the same time, short-field take-off and landing performance was also required. Since the Viggen was developed initially as an attack aircraft instead of an interceptor (the
Saab 35 Draken fulfilled this role), some emphasis was given to low fuel consumption at high subsonic speeds at low level for good range. With turbofan engines just emerging and indicating better fuel economy for cruise than
turbojet engines, the former was favoured, since the latter were mainly limited by metallurgy development resulting from limitations in
turbine temperature. Mechanical simplicity was also favoured, so the air intakes were simple D-section types with boundary layer
splitter plates, while the fixed inlet had no
adjustable geometry for improved pressure recovery. The disadvantage was that the required engine would be very large. It had a bypass ratio of around 1.07:1 in the RM8A, which reduced to 0.97:1 in the RM8B. The RM8A was the most powerful fighter engine in the late 1960s. Thrust is 72.1 kN dry and 125.0 kN with afterburner. Owing to the increased length and weight of the RM8B engine over its predecessor, the airframe of the JA 37 was stretched in order to accommodate it. In practice, the CK 37 proved to be more reliable than predicted. The computing techniques and concepts, such as
distributed computing, went beyond use of the Viggen, in addition to civil-orientated derivatives, it directly contributed to the computers used on board the Viggen's replacement, the Saab JAS 39 Gripen. Various
electronic countermeasures (ECM) were installed upon the Viggen, these were typically provided by Satt Elektronik. an optional Ericsson Erijammer pod and
BOZ-100 chaff/
flare pod.
Infrared warning receivers were also later installed. In total, the electronics weighed 600 kg, a substantial amount for a single-engine fighter of the era. In order to effectively enforce Sweden's air space, the Viggen was integrated with
STRIL 60 national defence system. In 1985, the "fighter link" entered service, permitting encrypted data communication between up to four fighters; this enabled one fighter to "paint" an airborne enemy with guidance radar for the
Skyflash missiles of the three other fighters in a group while they had their own search and guidance radars switched off. This system was operational ten years before any other country's. The autopilot was also slaved to the radar control to obtain better precision firing the cannon. Once in service, the Viggen's
software was regularly updated every 18 months. In 1983, the
mean time between failures (MTBF) was reported as 100 hours, a very high reliability level for the generation of avionics systems involved.
Cockpit The displays in the original cockpit were all of the traditional analogue/mechanical type with the exception of an electronic
head-up display (HUD), which Saab has claimed makes the Viggen easier to fly, especially at low altitudes during air-to-ground strike missions. Unusually for a 1970s fighter, the JA 37 variant of the Viggen featured three multi-purpose
cathode-ray tube (CRT) display screens fitted within the cockpit, in a system called AP-12, developed by Saab and Ericsson. On the twin-seat SK 37 trainer, the rear cockpit used by the instructor is only fitted with conventional instrumentation and lacks a HUD, computer controls and other features. The ejection seat was the Raketstol 37 (literally; Rocket chair 37) and was the last Saab designed seat in service. A derivative of the
Saab 105 trainer seat, the seat was optimized for low altitude, high speed ejections. As per then-standard practice within the Swedish Air Force, all cockpit instrumentation and labeling were in Swedish.
Wings and airframe With the performance requirements to a large extent dictating the choice of the engine, the airframe turned out to be quite bulky compared to contemporary slimmer designs with turbojet engines. The first prototypes had a straight midsection
fuselage that was later improved with a "hump" on the dorsal spine for reduced drag according to the
area rule. The wing had the shape of a double delta with a dogtooth added to improve longitudinal stability at high incidence angles. A consequence of a tailless delta design, such as in the Viggen, is that the elevons, which replace more conventional control surfaces, operate with a small effective
moment arm; their use adds substantial weight to the aircraft at takeoff and landing. Hinged leading edge surfaces can help counteract this, but an even more effective tool is the canard. The canard surfaces were positioned behind the inlets and placed slightly higher than the main wing, with a higher stall angle than the wing, and were equipped with flaps. The lifting canard surfaces act as a vortex generator for the main wing and therefore provide more lift. An added benefit was that they also improved roll stability in the transonic region. The canard flaps were deployed in conjunction with the landing gear to provide even more lift for takeoff and landing. To withstand the stresses of no-flare landings, Saab made extensive use of
aluminium in the airframe of the Viggen, which was constructed using a bonded metal
honeycomb structure; the entire rear section of the fuselage, downstream of the engine nozzle, formed a heat-resistant ring composed of
titanium. The main landing gear, manufactured by Motala Verkstad, was highly strengthened as well; each leg held two small wheels fitted with
anti-skid brakes placed in a tandem arrangement. The design requirements imposed by the large anti-ship missiles employed upon the Viggen necessitated that both the undercarriage and
vertical stabilizer be quite tall. The pylons behind the landing gear were not used until the JA 37D modification when BOL countermeasure dispensers were fitted to them. Ground crew would enter the munitions fitted into the aircraft's central computer using a load-selector panel, which would automatically choose the correct values for fire control, fuel consumption, and other calculations. The RB-04 was a relatively simple
cruise missile that was further developed to become the more capable
RBS-15, also integrated on the Viggen. An optional load consisted of two
Rb 05 air-to-surface missiles on the fuselage pylons. The RB 05 was later replaced by
AGM-65 Maverick (Swedish designation "RB 75")
television-guided missiles. In a ground-attack role, a combination of unguided 135 mm rockets in sextuple pods and 120 kg fragmentation bombs on quadruple-mounts could be used. Other armaments include
explosive mines, and 30 mm
ADEN cannon pods with 150 rounds of ammunition on the inboard wing pylons. Self-defence measures included various ECM systems, as well as either the
AIM-4 Falcon (Swedish designation "RB 28") or
AIM-9 Sidewinder (Swedish designation "RB 24") air-to-air missiles. At one point, the AJ 37 Viggen was under consideration as a carrier of both
a Swedish nuclear weapon and
chemical weapons, although no nuclear or chemical weapons were ultimately adopted by Sweden.
JA 37 The JA 37 fighter interceptor, introduced in 1979, featured the Ericsson PS 46/A radar which was capable of guiding the medium-range
semi-active radar homing RB 71
Skyflash air-to-air missiles. Both the RB 71 and the PS 46/A radar were designed to provide the Viggen with a
look-down/shoot-down capability and to engage targets at
beyond visual range distances. This, in conjunction with the fire control system, allowed air-to-air engagements at longer range than other fighters. Perhaps the most important improvement was the expanded
STRIL datalink which entered service in 1982–85. It allowed not only ground control-aircraft communication, but also between up to four aircraft simultaneously regardless if airborne or on the ground. Datalink information was displayed on the Horizontal Situation Display and a tactical display, the latter using link symbology that could be overlaid with an electronic map on a multifunction display. == Operational history ==