Critical response Brian Tallerico of
UGO gave the film an "A" and said that it is "the best western since
Unforgiven." Tallerico also said, "Stunning visuals, award-worthy performances, and a script that takes incredibly rewarding risks,
Jesse James is a masterpiece and one of the best films of the year." Kurt Loder of
MTV said, "If I were inclined to wheel out clichés like 'Oscar-worthy', I'd certainly wheel them out in support of this movie, on several counts."
Richard Roeper on the television show
Ebert & Roeper said, "If you love classic and stylish mood Westerns such as
McCabe and Mrs. Miller and
The Long Riders, this is your film."
Roger Ebert noted the "curiously erotic dance of death" between James and the "mesmerized" younger Ford. Finally, he said, "If Robert cannot be the lover of his hero, what would be more intimate than to kill him?" He notes that it has the "space and freedom" of classic Western epics, where "the land is so empty, it creates a vacuum demanding men to become legends." Josh Rosenblatt of
The Austin Chronicle gave the film 3.5 stars and said the film "grabs on to many of the classic tropes of the Western – the meandering passage of time, the imposing landscapes, the abiding loneliness, the casual violence – and sets about mapping their furthest edges." Film critic Emanuel Levy gave the film an "A" and wrote, "Alongside
Joel and Ethan Coen's
No Country for Old Men, which is a Western in disguise, or rather a modern Western,
Assassination of Jesse James is the second masterpiece of the season." Levy also wrote, "Like
Bonnie & Clyde, Dominik's seminal Western is a brilliant, poetic saga of America's legendary criminal as well as meditative deconstruction of our culture's most persistent issues: link of crime and fame, myths of heroism and obsession with celebrity." Lewis Beale of
Film Journal International said "Impeccably shot, cast and directed, this is a truly impressive film from sophomore writer-director
Andrew Dominik... but suffers from an unfortunate case of elephantiasis." Beale said Affleck is "outstanding in a breakout performance" and said Pitt is "scary and charismatic." Beale wrote, "The director seems so in love with his languorous pacing, he's incapable of cutting the five or ten seconds in any number of scenes that could have given the film a more manageable running time. In the scheme of things, however, this amounts to little more than a quibble." Beale said that ultimately, the film is "a fascinating, literary-based work that succeeds as both art and genre film." Critic
Mark Kermode named the film as his best of 2007 in his end-of-year review on
Simon Mayo's
BBC radio programme. Kermode later wrote that historians a hundred years from now will consider it "one of the most wrongly neglected masterpieces of its era." Many critics opined that the film is too long. Kirk Honeycutt of
The Hollywood Reporter said that the relationship between Pitt and Affleck "gets smothered in pointlessly long takes, repetitive scenes, grim Western landscapes and mumbled, heavily accented dialogue."
Los Angeles Daily News critic Bob Strauss gave the film 2.5 stars out of 4 and said, "To put it most bluntly, the thing is just too long and too slow." Strauss also said, "Every element of this Western is beautifully rendered. So why is it a chore to sit through?" Pam Grady of Reel.com gave the film 2 stars out of 4 and said, "The movie is merely a long, empty exercise in style." Stephanie Zacharek of
Salon.com said that the film "represents a breakthrough in the moviegoing experience. It may be the first time we've been asked to watch a book on tape." Peter Bradshaw's review in
The Guardian noted James's contribution to his own demise as well as the apparent
paradox in the title of both novel and film: Bradshaw took issue with the narration that often redundantly describes action clearly visible to the viewer on the screen. "The only false note is the use of a supercilious third-person narrative voiceover, which smudges the picture's crispness and clarity." During a post-screening Q & A at the movie's "revival" in 2013, Dominik reported that when he showed
Terrence Malick a cut of
Jesse James, his reaction was "it's too slow," drawing a laugh from the audience.
Manohla Dargis of
The New York Times called Roger Deakins' cinematography "impeccable, stark, high-contrast" and wrote that "the cinematography may speak to Mr. Dominik's yearning for meaning and importance more than it does of his outlaw, but the visuals often dazzle and enthrall." Deakins' work on the film is widely acclaimed and considered to be some of the best cinematography of the 21st century.
Top ten lists The film appeared on many critics' top ten lists of the best films of 2007.
Accolades 's portrayal of
Robert Ford received critical acclaim, earning him a nomination for the
Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor.
The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford was identified by the
National Board of Review of Motion Pictures as one of the top 10 films of 2007. The board also named
Casey Affleck as Best Supporting Actor in the film. The
San Francisco Film Critics Circle named
The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford as the Best Picture of 2007. The circle also awarded Affleck as best supporting actor for the film. Affleck was nominated for Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role in a Motion Picture for the
65th Golden Globe Awards. The film received two
Academy Award nominations for the
80th Academy Awards. Affleck was nominated for
Best Supporting Actor and
Roger Deakins was nominated for
Best Cinematography. Earlier in the year,
Brad Pitt won the prestigious
Volpi Cup for Best Actor when the film premiered at the annual
Venice Film Festival. Several other awards circles also awarded composers
Nick Cave and
Warren Ellis for their music in the film (see below). The film also holds a place on
Empire's recent list of
The 500 Greatest Films of All Time, coming in at #396. In 2016, it was voted the 92nd best film since 2000 in an international critics' poll. In July 2025, it was one of the films voted for the "Readers' Choice" edition of
The New York Times list of "The 100 Best Movies of the 21st Century," finishing at number 239. That same month, it ranked number 87 on
Rolling Stones list of "The 100 Best Movies of the 21st Century." ==References==