'' by Johannes de Thurocz Thurocz's chronicle was written in three main parts: • The first part is Thurocz's interpretation of a poem by
Lorenzo de Monacis of
Venice. It deals with the rule of King
Charles II of Hungary, and was probably written on the initiative of Thurocz's superior Stephen of Haserhag (the general notary of the Royal court), or perhaps that of the country judge Thomas Drági. Physically, this part is attached to part c) below. • Thurocz wrote the second part was written in 1486 and describes the deeds of
Hungarian kings up to
Louis the Great. This part in turn consists of three sub-sections: :# the so-called Hunnish chronicle based on old Hungarian chronicles (
Chronicon Pictum,
Buda Chronicle) and preserved manuscripts, in which Thurocz attempts to correct the errors of his predecessors; :# an interpretation of the history of the Hungarian Kingdom from 895 (arrival of the Magyars) until the rule of King
Charles I of Hungary (1307 – 42); :# a history of part of the reign of
Louis I of Hungary (reigned 1342 – 82), which arose through incorporation of a chronicle written by
John of Küküllő. • The third part describes events from the death of King Charles II the Small (died 1386) until the conquest of
Vienna and
Wiener Neustadt by King
Matthias Corvinus in August 1487; this can be considered Thurocz's own original work, and was mostly written in early 1487. It was inspired by the famous historico-geographical lexicon
Cosmographia by
Aeneas Silvius Piccolomini and was based largely on existing diplomatic documents and letters. However, information from the
Cosmographia was selected somewhat one-sidedly and haphazardly. According to his own words in the work's dedication, Thurocz had no ambitions as an historian. In fact, his chronicle contains many errors and omits a number of significant events. Besides more reliable sources, the work relies extensively on oral tradition, folk songs and anecdotes, and contains many references to "miraculous" events and wonders. Destiny and fortune play a significant role in history as seen by Thurocz. Like many of his contemporaries he was convinced of the close relationship between human fortune, historical events and the motion of celestial bodies. Thurocz sought an explanation of a number of events in the
moral imperative. He gave much attention to describing the inner feelings of historical characters, but had an evident tendency to idealize the Hungarian heroes
Attila and
Matthias Corvinus, while downplaying the significance of Hungary's queens. ==Early editions ==