John Lintner

John Lintner was born to John Virgil and Pearl Lintner in Lone Elm, KS on February 9, 1916. From his first marriage to Sylvia Chace, he had two children, John Howland and Nancy Chace. From his second marriage to Eleanor Hodges, he had a stepson, Allan Hodges. Lintner died of a heart attack while driving on June 8, 1983, in Cambridge, MA. == Education ==

He received an A.B., in 1939 and a M.A., in 1940 from the University of Kansas; a M.A., in 1942; and Ph.D., in 1946 from Harvard University. == Positions ==

• 1939-40 - Instructor, Business Administration, University of Kansas, Lawrence • 1941 - Member of Research Staff on fiscal policy, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York • 1946-51 - Assistant Professor, Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration • 1951-56 - Associate Professor, Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration • 1956-64 - Professor of Business Administration, Harvard University • 1964-83 - George Gund Professor of Economics and Business Administration, Harvard University • 1950-83 - Member of Board of trustees, Cambridge Savings Bank • 1975-83 - Board of director, US & Foreign securities corp, Chase of Boston Mutual Funds • Consultant to business & government == Lintner's dividend policy model ==

Lintner's dividend policy model is a model theorizing how a publicly traded company sets its dividend policy. The logic is that every company wants to maintain a constant rate of dividend even if the results in a particular period are not up to the mark. The assumption is that investors will prefer to receive a certain dividend payout. The model states that dividends are paid according to two factors. The first is the net present value of earnings, with higher values indicating higher dividends. The second is the sustainability of earnings; that is, a company may increase its earnings without increasing its dividend payouts until managers are convinced that it will continue to maintain such earnings. The theory was adopted based on observations that many companies will set their long-run target dividends-to-earnings ratios based upon the amount of positive net-present-value projects that they have available. The model then uses two parameters, the target payout ratio and the speed where current dividends adjust to that target: \begin{align} D_{t} &= D_{t-1}+\rho\cdot \left ( D_{t}^{*}-D_{t-1} \right ) \\ &= D_{t-1}+\rho\cdot \left ( \tau \cdot E_{t}-D_{t-1} \right ) \\ &= \rho\cdot \tau \cdot E_{t}+(1-\rho)\cdot D_{t-1} \\ &= \rho\cdot D_{t}^{*}+(1-\rho)\cdot D_{t-1} \end{align} where: • D_{t} is the dividend per share at time t • D_{t-1} is the dividend per share at time (t-1), i.e. last year's dividend per share • \rho is the speed of adjustment rate or the partial adjustment coefficient, with 0 \leq \rho \leq 1 • D_{t}^{*} is the target dividend per share at time t, with D_{t}^{*} = \tau \cdot E_{t} • \tau is the target payout ratio on earnings per share (or on free-cash-flow per share), with 0 \leq \tau \leq 1 • E_{t} is the earnings per share (or free-cash-flow per share) at time t When applying its model to U.S. stocks, Lintner found \rho \simeq 30% and \tau \simeq 50%. == Bibliography ==

• John V. Lintner papers at Baker Library Special Collections, Harvard Business School.