Anti-Competitive practices In July 2016, the Journal de Montréal filed an injunction against its satirical newspaper, Le Journal de Mourréal. This decision was immediately perceived as a violation of freedom of expression and garnered support from numerous artists, such as
Mike Ward, as well as from many lawyers who were willing to defend the case pro bono following the launch of a crowdfunding campaign, and from the Quebec public. In its application,
Agence QMI claimed that the online publication was causing confusion among "ordinary people who are rather busy."
Reprimandation from Conseil de presse du Québec In March 2010, the Conseil de presse du Québec reprimanded Le Journal de Montréal for providing incomplete information, which could lead to misinterpretation, regarding an article about a demonstration held in honour of
Fredy Villanueva. The decision was upheld by the Press Council's Appeals Commission. In September 2012, the Conseil de presse du Québec again reprimanded Le Journal de Montréal for inaccurate information, discriminatory remarks, and prejudice against the
Coalition large de l’Association pour une solidarité syndicale étudiante. In January 2017, the Conseil de presse du Québec issued a severe reprimand to the website journaldemontreal.com for inaccurate information.
Allegations of selective political coverage Le Journal de Montréal is owned by Quebecor, which is run by former leader of the separatist
Parti Québécois,
Pierre Karl Péladeau. The Journal is noted for pushing support on
Quebec Independence through tabloid-style exposés on Quebec
identity politics. Former Journal de Montreal writer
Toula Drimonis raised concerns about how the Péladeau owned properties where not only trying to shape how Quebecers see themselves and the rest of Canada, but also how the rest of Canada sees Quebec. Taillefer then told
Paul Arcand in a radio interview that he believes Péladeau uses his properties to influences the views of Quebecois. They pointed out how the story was not picked by other Quebec news outlets such as La Presse nor Radio-Canada. The Hill Times also pointed that the Journal rehashed a 1996 story by former La Presse journalist
Chantal Hébert as well as the 2007 Grenier Commission on the referendum found no irregularities with the citizenship applications being sped up and no impact on the vote. At the heart of the dispute, was the increased convergence between media outlets in the group, job cuts in the classified advertising and accounting departments, and the lengthening of the workweek. Three days after the conflict began, a strike mandate was passed by the affected employees. The locked out workers published their own, competing newspaper, called
Rue Frontenac, which was published on paper weekly and more often online. continued to publish with the use of
strikebreakers, managers, and
wire services. After 25 months on strike, 64% of unionized employees agreed to a settlement proposal submitted by an arbitrator to the case. Former employees have taken an issues with Journal columnist. On February 19 2020,
Journal de Montréal published by columnist
Richard Martineau, a story falsely accusing McGill Faculty of Law professor
Daniel Weinstock as a supporter of genital mutilation. One of the unions representing workers was also critical of the front page by stating that it negatively impact "our reputation and our credibility as journalists" and that they deal with the fallout of the decision. ==See also==