World War II Purchase of Nazi Germany's Reichsmarks A press release from the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in 2004 announced that many of the new
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) files had become declassified. This declassification enabled the discovery that before and during the early years of
World War II, the
German government sold a special kind of
Reichsmark, known as Rückwanderer [returnee] Marks, to American citizens of German descent. Chase National Bank, along with other businesses, were involved in these transactions. Through Chase, this allowed Nazi sympathizers to purchase Marks with
dollars at a discounted rate. Specifically, "The financial houses understood that the German government paid the commissions (to its agents, including Chase) through the sale of discounted, blocked Marks that came mainly from
Jews who had fled
Germany." In other words, Nazi Germany was able to offer these Marks below face-value because they had been stolen from
émigrés fleeing the Nazi regime. Between 1936 and 1941, the
Nazis amassed over $20 million, and the businesses enabling these transactions earned $1.2 million in commissions. Of these commissions, over $500,000 went to Chase National Bank and its subagents. These facts were discovered when the FBI began its investigation in October 1940. The purpose of the investigation was to follow German-Americans who had bought the Marks. However, Chase National Bank's executives were never federally prosecuted because Chase's lead attorney threatened to reveal
FBI,
Army, and
Navy "sources and methods" in court. Publicly naming the sources and methods could have posed security risks and threatened future
intelligence gathering. To avoid such revelations, the executives' violations of the
Johnson Act, the
Espionage Act, and the
Foreign Agents Registration Act were never prosecuted. During the occupation of France by the Nazis, there was a controversial scheme known as the Rückwanderer Mark Scheme. In addition to this, NARA records revealed another controversy involving the release of funds to Nazi Germany. From the late 1930s until June 14, 1941, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) issued an Executive Order freezing German assets, Chase National Bank worked with the Nazi government. The order, which blocked access to French accounts in the U.S. by anyone, especially the Nazis, was issued by Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau Jr., with the approval of FDR. Despite this order, Chase unblocked the accounts within hours and the funds were transferred through South America to Nazi Germany.
Refusal to release funds belonging to Jews in occupied France U.S. Treasury officials wanted an investigation of French subsidiaries of American banks, including: Chase Bank,
J.P. Morgan & Co,
National City Corporation,
Guaranty Bank,
Bankers Trust, and
American Express. Of these banks, only Chase and Morgan remained open in France during the
Nazi occupation. The Chase branch chief in Paris, France, Carlos Niedermann, told his supervisor in New York that there had been an "expansion of deposits". Also, Niedermann was, "very vigorous in enforcing restrictions against Jewish property, even going so far as to refuse to release funds belonging to Jews in anticipation that a decree with
retroactive provisions prohibiting such release might be published in the near future by the occupying Nazi authorities" . In 1998, Chase general counsel William McDavid said that Chase did not have control over Niedermann. Whether that claim was true or not, Chase Manhattan Bank acknowledged seizing about 100 accounts during the
Vichy regime. Kenneth McCallion, a partner in the New York firm Goodkind Labaton Rudoff & Sucharow, led a lawsuit against
Barclays Bank for the illegal seizure of assets during
World War Two and has since turned his attention toward Chase. The
World Jewish Congress (WJC), entered into discussions with Chase and a spokesperson for the WJC said, "Nobody at Chase today is guilty. They were not involved in whatever happened, but they do accept that they have an institutional responsibility." A Chase spokesman said, "This is a moral issue that we take very seriously." Chase general counsel McDavid added, "that Chase intends to compensate Jewish account holders whose assets were illegally plundered". In 1999, the French government formed a commission to report findings to
Prime Minister Lionel Jospin. a commission member and history professor at the
Sorbonne, said that under the Vichy regime, French banks received visits from Nazi officials but U.S. banks did not. At that time, they did not have to report Jewish accounts, but they did just as the French banks did. She goes on to say that an American
ambassador protected the U.S. subsidiaries.
Related legal action In May 1999, Chase Manhattan reached a settlement with 20 plaintiffs who filed an asset reparations lawsuit, such as the
Claims Conference, a Jewish restitution organization, and the WJC. It was determined that Chase only owned a sum that was well under $1 million in asset reparations by this point in time.
2010s and 2020s JPMorgan Chase has paid $16 billion in fines, settlements, and other litigation expenses from 2011 to 2013. Of the $16 billion JPMorgan Chase has paid, about $8.5 billion were for fines and settlements resulting from illegal actions taken by bank executives, according to Richard Eskow at the Campaign for America's Future, who cited a new report from Joshua Rosner of Graham Fisher & Co. The $16 billion total does not include a recent settlement that calls for JPMorgan Chase to pay $100 million to waive $417 million in claims it had made against clients of the firm
MF Global. The
U.S. Treasury's
Office of Foreign Assets Control found that JPMorgan had illegally aided dictatorships in
Cuba,
Sudan,
Liberia and
Iran, including transferring 32,000 ounces of
gold bullion (valued at approximately $20,560,000) to the benefit of a bank in Iran. JPMorgan did not voluntarily self-disclose the Iranian matter to
OFAC. Among its other transgressions, JPMorgan has been found to have: • Misled investors • Engaged in
fictitious trades • Collected illegal
flood insurance commissions • Wrongfully foreclosed on soldiers; charged veterans hidden fees for refinancing • Violated the
Federal Trade Commission Act by
making false statements to people seeking automobile loans • Illegally increased their collection of
overdraft fees by processing large transactions before smaller ones • Helped drive
Jefferson County, Alabama, into
bankruptcy by switching its fixed-rate debt to variable • Violated
antitrust provision of the
Sherman Act relating to
bid rigging • Stole and auctioned items from deposit boxes of private individuals and governments.
Targeted account closures During 2013 and 2014, Chase and other banks received media attention for the practice of cancelling the personal and business accounts of hundreds of legal
sex workers, citing in some instances the "
morality clause" of their account agreement. Later it was discovered that this practice included mortgage accounts and business loans. Chase canceled the mortgage refinancing process for one individual, which the bank had initiated, whose production company made
soft core films like those broadcast on
Cinemax. This resulted in a lawsuit which cited evasive dealings and misleading statements by several Chase executives including Securities Vice President Adam Gelcich, Legal Fair Lending Department Vice President Deb Vincent, and an unnamed executive director and assistant general counsel. In addition to closing accounts for sex workers, the bank has also been using its "morality clause" to disassociate from other types of businesses. Some of these other businesses include
medical marijuana dispensaries and any that are "gun related". In 2019, the bank faced growing criticism for its alleged practice of arbitrarily targeting the personal accounts of outspoken online personalities such as
Martina Markota and
Proud Boys chairman
Enrique Tarrio. Although the specific motives behind the closures were not officially disclosed the assumption among many on the right was that they were political in nature.
Dakota Access Pipeline Financial documents from
Energy Transfer Partners, the pipeline builder for the
Dakota Access Pipeline, lists a number of large banking institutions that have provided credit for the project, including JPMorgan Chase. Because of these financial ties, Chase and other banks were a target of the
Dakota Access Pipeline protests during 2016 and 2017.
Parental leave policy JPMorgan Chase agreed to pay $5 million to compensate their male employees who did not receive the same paid
parental leave as women from 2011 to 2017. In December 2017, the bank "clarified its policy to ensure equal access to men and women looking to be their new child's main caregiver". According to the involved attorneys, this is the biggest recorded settlement in a U.S. parental leave discrimination case. JPMorgan agreed to train and monitor to ensure equal parental leave benefits and stated that "its policy was always intended to be gender-neutral".
Fossil fuel investment Chase has faced criticism and protests over its high rate of investment in various
fossil fuel industries such as coal, oil, and gas. A study released in October 2019 indicated that Chase invests more ($75 billion) in fossil fuels than any other bank.
Unequal lending practices An analysis of home purchases in Chicago from 2012 to 2018 by
City Bureau and
WBEZ Chicago showed that JPMorgan Chase, "loaned 41 times more in Chicago's white neighborhoods than it did in the city's black neighborhoods". The report prompted protests at Chicago Chase branches in June 2020. At a reopening of a remodeled Chase branch in Chicago's
South Shore, Dimon said via video, "we have targets now to do $600 million (over the next five years) in new mortgages for Blacks and new homeowners in Chicago neighborhoods".
Facilitation of sex trafficking The U.S. government sued JPMorgan Chase Bank in 2022, alleging that the bank "facilitated, sustained, and concealed the human trafficking network operated by
Jeffrey Epstein."
ATM glitch incident In 2024, a glitch occurred in Chase's ATMs which allowed users to withdraw money using fraudulent checks. This type of bank fraud is commonly known as
check kiting. ==References==